bmuon's comments

bmuon | 4 years ago | on: My First CSS

This makes me very happy.

As a frontend engineer who started 15 years ago, learning the box model required a lot of knowledge of the internals of the browser. The times of having to know things like quirks mode, abusing overflow hidden [1], how to break the behavior of float, etc are long gone. This is great both for us having to struggle less, and for the newer generations to be able to tackle harder problems than just layout and build cooler stuff.

[1]: https://css-tricks.com/clearfix-a-lesson-in-web-development-...

bmuon | 4 years ago | on: Virtual DOM is pure overhead (2018)

> I am convinced that if react really wanted to, they could make optimizations to make it really close to svelte

Facebook has been working for a while on Ahead-Of-Time compilation for React. Interestingly, it looks like they thought the problem was too complicated and they gave up:

> To address this challenge we initially experimented with one approach to ahead-of-time (AOT) optimization — Prepack — but ultimately that direction did not pan out. Specifically, we realized that many AOT optimizations don’t work because they either don’t have enough global knowledge or they have too little. For example, a component might be static in practice because it always receive a constant string from its parent, but the compiler can’t see that far and thinks the component is dynamic. Even when we could make optimizations work, we found that they were unpredictable to the developer. Without predictability it was hard for developers to rely on them.

Instead they're now experimenting with moving the virtual DOM resolution to the server and avoiding sending all the "templating" code to the client, which achieves a similar result. See https://reactjs.org/blog/2020/12/21/data-fetching-with-react....

bmuon | 4 years ago | on: Virtual DOM is pure overhead (2018)

Yes and no.

Browser differences are mostly disappearing, they have gained some very good APIs are CSS has gained significant layout capabilities with grids and flex. So the need for libraries like jQuery for dealing with DOM differences is disappearing. New standard libraries like Intl and now Temporal make libraries like Moment obsolete.

The web is also gaining a component model with Web Components that will help you get some level of sanity when building some mildly complex reusable stuff. This is probably very good for content heavy sites, which make the majority of the web.

The other part of the web is applications running on top of the Web platform. Those still heavily benefit from frameworks. Having some amount of sanity when managing state is very much welcome. And functional programming models have proven that a declarative way of approaching UIs is much better than dealing with browser APIs imperatively.

So for some years frameworks will still be useful for certain use cases. For the others, we should be embracing Web technologies. Maybe with some light libraries like Stencil and Catalyst.

bmuon | 4 years ago | on: Temporal: Getting started with JavaScript's new date time API

You don't need a zoned date. You can invert the question and ask if a zoned datetime falls within a plain date.

Temporal is very well designed thanks to building on years of prior art. Give it a try and you'll realize that it leads you to ask those questions the right way.

bmuon | 4 years ago | on: Request for comments regarding topics to be discussed at Dark Patterns workshop

Highly debatable. In fact, trying to classify it as a dark pattern may derail the very valid discussion that the FTC is trying to have. There are significantly worse patterns out there. See [1].

What the push notification pattern is, is annoying. And it is specially annoying because of a prevalence of confirmation dialogs all over the Web with GDPR/CCPA, paid subscriptions, etc. But does it cause harm or monetary loss as the sneak into basket pattern? Or the opt-out unnecessary "insurance" that airlines continue to put in the checkout flow?

We do a disservice to ourselves littering the web with these constant asks. But it's not what needs regulation and enforcement.

[1] https://www.darkpatterns.org/types-of-dark-pattern

bmuon | 5 years ago | on: Ask HN: Why Isn't Open Source Voting Software Mandated?

It's not just about security. It's also about democracy. Who can verify that a voting system is secure? Only software engineers. And to be honest, only a small subset of them. Your own comment hints at that. Paper ballots allow anyone to verify the results of an election. It's supposed to be a universal process that everyone can be a part of.

bmuon | 5 years ago | on: Full-Bleed Layout Using CSS Grid

The parent-child problem you mention can be addressed with names. Children can say "grid-name: footer". This is just a hint for the parent to decide where to place it in the grid. Then the parent can use grid-template-areas to arrange its children. You no longer need to change the children if you're adding columns to the layout.

(I agree with you on this simple layout)

bmuon | 5 years ago | on: New York Times phasing out all 3rd-party advertising data

I'm surprised there's so many comments here about demographic data while that's only a really basic view into current ad tech. Since the late 2000s ad networks have invested heavily in retargeting [1]. It's quite common that people end up in a vendor, add something to the cart and never finish the transaction. Retargeting attempts to catch behaviors like that and adjust to display the items that the user showed interest in. I haven't been in that industry in years, but in the 2020s I can only expect much more nuanced systems based on ML. And everything falls apart without being able to keep a history of what you do and who you are.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_retargeting

bmuon | 7 years ago | on: Microsoft acquires Github

If I learned anything working at large companies is that hardware is never close to being as expensive as headcount.

bmuon | 8 years ago | on: Three Meanings of E=mc²

While it might be true that the temperatures of rocket fuel burning are enough to create plasma and some reactions that lead to mass turning into energy, I think Jabavu is right in that the energy comes from the chemical reaction, not from E=mc2.
page 1