buckwilson | 1 year ago | on: Show HN: Owl, a Spaced Repetition App
buckwilson's comments
buckwilson | 16 years ago | on: Blipr: The Story of an iPhone App
Have you taken a stab at marketing? Do you have any insights in that area (either successes or failures)?
buckwilson | 16 years ago | on: Blipr: The Story of an iPhone App
buckwilson | 16 years ago | on: WildlifeNearYou.com - built by 12 hackers on a fort in a week (sort of)
Thanks, website.
buckwilson | 16 years ago | on: Amazon will be the Largest Company in the World and 1st Trillion Dollar Company
At current trading, Wal-Mart is worth just over 204B, just for comparison.
buckwilson | 16 years ago | on: Tablet Musings
buckwilson | 16 years ago | on: JQuery Code Smells
$myDiv = $('#myDiv');
Now I know every time that $myDiv is already wrapped in jQ and I won't make the mistake of wrapping it again $($myDiv) in my code.
buckwilson | 16 years ago | on: Ask HN: What are you working on?
Currently doing a UI refresh, planning a big marketing push including ads, contacting interested journalists, designing a web site / blog, planning the support workflow, and other fun stuff.
Things are going really well for us so far. Won a nice iPhone app competition, getting some pretty good buzz building, and looking to launch to a decent crowd of interested parties!
buckwilson | 16 years ago | on: Version 1 Sucks, But Ship It Anyway
For instance, before we launched a version of our software, we spent two months working on security mechanisms to make sure it couldn't be stolen or pirated or hacked. While security is important, it was a mistake for us to take it as seriously as we did, and we wound up wasting those resources in hindsight.
buckwilson | 16 years ago | on: Matt Brezina: No One Cares About Your Stupid Little Startup
buckwilson | 16 years ago | on: SharePics rejected for looking like a Polaroid
Looks like getting rejected is a one way ticket to hypesville, though, so good luck with that part.
buckwilson | 16 years ago | on: PPK: "Apple is not evil. iPhone developers are stupid."
But giving this article any credence is giving it too much credit. It's shock-blogging and nothing more.
I've always been interested in spaced repetition but never had the patience to learn the "right" way to do it. This looks pretty helpful.
Do you think this AI x repetition concept works better for some types of learning than others?