c_c_c's comments

c_c_c | 9 years ago | on: HN comments are underrated

Yes, those poor persecuted "whites". With the minorities running the U.S. now, it's very dangerous for us. I narrowly avoided being sent to one of the "whites" concentration camps myself.

c_c_c | 9 years ago | on: HN comments are underrated

This is certainly true. The "race of users" isn't being "police[d]". It is just a reflection of the subject matter of HN and a reflection of the tech field in general.

c_c_c | 9 years ago | on: How landlords get kickbacks to lock tenants into big Internet providers

Do you enjoy Verizon press releases? "Miles ran", "houses passed". Industry doublespeak. NYC residents invested those billions via rate hikes the PUC granted to Verizon!! It was subsidized even though Verizon claims otherwise. And they didn't deliver.

http://www1.nyc.gov/assets/doitt/downloads/pdf/verizon-audit...

https://www3.dps.ny.gov/pscweb/WebFileRoom.nsf/Web/B849A0203...

http://www1.nyc.gov/office-of-the-mayor/news/415-15/de-blasi...

c_c_c | 9 years ago | on: Reasons not to use (i.e., be used by) Facebook

Not going to comment on the efficacy of "used" versus "user" in RMS' argument here. However, your comparison to "Democrap", etc. doesn't seem to fit here very well. The former is a shorthand for his entire argument and technically correct. Facebook "users" are "used" by Facebook. This is their business model. The latter is just simple name calling serving no useful purpose.

c_c_c | 9 years ago | on: Microsoft to acquire LinkedIn for $26B

This is the most bizarre thing I've heard. People want Snapchat, Instagram. People have LinkedIn. No one wants it. It's a dinosaur. People using it actively just haven't realized it's dead already.

c_c_c | 9 years ago | on: Microsoft to acquire LinkedIn for $26B

LinkedIn at 10% of Facebook's cap is super over valued. It's pure spam. Everyone is suggesting Microsoft will improve, add features! It would have been better and cheaper to create from scratch. LinkedIn exists in a space that none of the big player care to enter seriously.

c_c_c | 9 years ago | on: This is the most demonically clever computer security attack I've seen in years

You do realize that Stuxnet required a failure of physical security. Either an agent inserted intentionally via USB or an employee inserted a compromised USB unwillingly. Neither should happen in a secure facility.

The paper shows simple yet sophisticated POC. The simplicity is the scary part. BTW, do you think the University of Michigan spends more on research than the NSA, GCHQ, BND, DGSE, 3PLA, etc.

c_c_c | 9 years ago | on: This is the most demonically clever computer security attack I've seen in years

I really hope you're not involved with securing sensitive systems. This is the nightmare right here. Who cares about hardened a OS when the hardware is compromised in a way that is virtually undetectable. Very few have the resources to verify every item on the board and its purpose. The fact that this is even possible is a problem.
page 1