captaincaveman's comments

captaincaveman | 2 years ago | on: The Fall of Stack Overflow

They are a user, they choose to moderate or not, forcing people in this way to contribute only in a very specific way means, less users ...

captaincaveman | 2 years ago | on: Unprecedented ocean temps “surpassing model predictions,” warn experts

I'm a good bit older than you, for me the eye opener is by travelling the world and seeing how much has been trashed. When I was a kid it felt like there was a vast amount of nature out there (even then a lot of damage had been done, but many of the wildlife docs etc were just old enough that when filmed there was more nature).

Growing up in a modern western city I was far removed from it, but then travelling and seeing how much has been carved up and domesticated (as well as the cultural homogenisation), it really feels we are doing future generations a massive wrong.

captaincaveman | 2 years ago | on: Warwick: Cyborg or Media Doll?

In the late 90's /2000 Kevin Warwick was saying AI is is going to be increasingly problematic, and was considered something of a buffoon by academia (or some of), now they are all on the bandwagon.

Cybernetics at Reading did a lot of Neural Network stuff, less Symbolic due to the Cybernetics philosophy.

captaincaveman | 3 years ago | on: Ok, it’s time to freak out about AI

Its this sort of drivel that I hope ChatGPT will destroy, people bullshitting on topics they don't have insightful understanding of is exactly what a bot is good for. So yes freak out the bots can do that now, you can stop writing.

captaincaveman | 3 years ago | on: Why did 250k Britons die sooner than expected?

If we kick the Conservatives, hmmm I wonder who will be next up to bat, ohh for about a decade until we are sick of their incompetence.. goto 10.

They just literally wait their turn, terrible incompetence and no accountability.

captaincaveman | 3 years ago | on: Another Round of Layoffs at Meta

Cutting staff is not going to reduce their revenue for some time, and in the interim their profits increase and thus defends the stock price at a time the tech sector is getting reassessed (valuations are too high, and need adjusting).

The point is, it has nothing to do with having money in the bank to pay them.

captaincaveman | 3 years ago | on: Bard and new AI features in Search

Well that person has reputation/credibility and some reasoning they apply, before passing on the information. Just because you read that the world is flat are you gonna start telling people that? Now let's be clear, some people do mindlessly regurgitate nonsense, but their creditability is typically very low, so you ignore them. There is a grey area where some things aren't clear, but on the basics people of average intelligence are fairly robust, I'm not convinced chatGPT is.
page 3