centralscam | 3 years ago | on: Do central banks’ mounting losses actually matter?
centralscam's comments
centralscam | 3 years ago | on: Do central banks’ mounting losses actually matter?
Yeah exactly. We "need" global communism to fight Climate change, right? I'll pass. If there is a solution it's going to be a bottom up technological innovation.
There was no time and place except under mostly decentralized capitalism when workers where not exploited. Whatever that word even means to you. Normal socialists seem think every transaction is "exploitation".
It's pretty black and white. Centralization only allows for one solution and smothers all others. If the central plan fails, like central banking does right now, it fails for everyone all at once and there is no escape.
centralscam | 3 years ago | on: Do central banks’ mounting losses actually matter?
Anytime someone borrows money from a bank new money is created. It's supposedly not a problem because when the debt is paid back the money is destroyed again. In reality, though, debt is never paid back, especially by governments. Instead it's refinanced be taking on ever more debt. The amount of debt is only ever growing and so is the money supply.
centralscam | 3 years ago | on: Do central banks’ mounting losses actually matter?
Central planning of food production has created famines with no equal in history.
Central planning of housing created those lovely soviet style "housing" block developments while the beautiful inner cities of eastern europe rotted away.
Central planning of car production gave you cars like the Trabant which you literally had to queue 18 years for.
I am sure there is nothing that could go wrong with central planning the money supply but just in case economic live feels harder than it ought to maybe it's because of certain institutions continuously inflating away the value of your currency.