cybersnowflake
|
6 years ago
|
on: Google Employees Explain How They Were Retaliated Against for Reporting Abuse
"1) Reasons why you are getting down voted. A comment talking about being down voted (which is amusing considering your username)."
nah dude you can downvote me a million times. I'm just asking politely why I'm and other people I see just stating unpopular opinions are being flagged, which is a more serious measure I hoped would be reserved for things a bit less subjective than 'immaturity'. But if it isn't nbd, I just hope to clarify things so everybody knows from now on. I mean its not like theres clear completely nonvague objective rules and spelled out consequences carved in stone in the easiest to find places.
"This is enough to get a down vote in my book. 2) An immature post. There are numerous signs, including the LOL at the end, that it's immature. 3) Fairly insulting to people who come here. 4)"
I've never personally insulted anyone here....as far as I remember. If you mean indirectly than well thats so subjective everybody here indirectly insults someone all the time.
"Your original comment is constantly begging the question. The reality is, you aren't interested in a discussion."
Not true, I am happy to engage anyone who wants to debate me. Like now, my history is open book for you to freely browse, show me something in it clearly refutes this, it actually stands as a clear testament to the opposite. If I am wrong on the hard facts I will acquiese. If you think its pointless well isn't all/most discussion on threads like these pointless?
" 5) "I'm just stating an unpopular opinion without any trolling, spam, or personal attacks" No, you aren't "just stating an unpopular opinion" if this keeps happening to you. If this happens to you constantly, it's because you are wrong. Your opinion of your comments is wrong for the community."
speaking of dismissing arguments.
cybersnowflake
|
6 years ago
|
on: Google Employees Explain How They Were Retaliated Against for Reporting Abuse
Thats the funny thing. You're basically erasing the Spanish language with the nongendered approach of English by using the term.
cybersnowflake
|
6 years ago
|
on: Google Employees Explain How They Were Retaliated Against for Reporting Abuse
okay I understand people downvoting me because they don't like what I say but I wish I'd at least get an explanation why I'm constantly being flagged if I'm just stating an unpopular opinion without any trolling, spam, or personal attacks (against other commentators. People here regularly attack article subjects so I assume thats okay).
cybersnowflake
|
6 years ago
|
on: Bots Help Moderate Stack Overflow
Oh they definitely downvote you simply for closed questions.Which you'd know if you regularly used the site or didn't assume that I was unfamiliar with it. Also the bans might be temporary but the demerits last for years at least. I know because I have ones from 2016. Of course most of what you and I are might say about actual policy isn't certain since its all hidden. The mark of bad moderation policy is hidden/vague policy but the overwhelming practice in most places including here.
cybersnowflake
|
6 years ago
|
on: Bots Help Moderate Stack Overflow
Yes you do. Among other things. Its one of the things that counts toward your 'demerit' score. Or at least it certainly appears to. Theres people who haven't done anything but ask a couple 'stupid questions' that were answered before that were modded. Of course their moderation policy is so opaque only the admin could tell you exactly what happened.Or maybe not since they seen keen to adapt the 'Google approach' of having their bots take over sight unseen.
cybersnowflake
|
6 years ago
|
on: Bots Help Moderate Stack Overflow
Maybe stop banhammering newbies simply because you think their question about obscure arcane algorithm #44462 is too similar to an even more arcane question 10 years ago about algorithm #783429 and its immediately obvious to a regular with a pH.D in quantum statistics.
The only major support site I'm aware of with a 'stupid questions' punishment policy. Which isn't a bad thing in and of itself except its implemented in such a draconian and nontransparent way. Demerits never seem to expire, even after years of no 'stupid' posts and theres no explanation where they come from.
The bizarre thing is even with this and newbies banned left and right it seems the admin is on another planet running some other website as all they want to talk about is social justice and how evil heteronormative SO users somehow can psychically tell who is a woman or minority and supposedly harassing them to epidemic proportions but nobody somehow ever sees this.
Maybe get a handle on a few real basic problems before you start crowing about your geewhiz new bot.
cybersnowflake
|
6 years ago
|
on: California Approves Statewide Rent Control
The productivity is higher because you have one of the highest concentrations in the world of big companies at the top of the field employing the best people and most resources. Not rocket science.
This has nothing to do with people that think they deserve to work there (which I frankly don't get what the big deal is, you're not a teenager scoping out the best colleges anymore) but obviously the marketplace disagrees.
cybersnowflake
|
6 years ago
|
on: The Myth of the Wealthy Welder
There is a ton of need for skilled blue collar jobs and there are plenty of well paying ones available. More than jobs for ethnic studies majors. This is not opinion this is fact.
cybersnowflake
|
6 years ago
|
on: California Approves Statewide Rent Control
Why do people NEED to work in san francisco/LA? You may think you're contributing something valuable being a barista or adjunct ethnic studies professor in the Bay Area but if you can't survive there maybe the others don't agree. Move to a house bigger than a shoebox with less traffic, less filth, and less crazy politicians, and lower costs. Whats the hangup? I don't understand these people who watched pirates of silicon valley and now they have to live in a shack on location.
cybersnowflake
|
6 years ago
|
on: California Approves Statewide Rent Control
"There just isn't an option for everyone to move away from the bay area and still have work."
>>>>>>>>>
If you can't afford to live in a box in San Jose, obviously staying isn't an option either.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Take your "I've got mine so screw everyone else" attitude out of the bay area, we don't have room here for people with so little empathy for their neighbors."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Oh I don't live in the Bay Area. Theres an entire nation outside of San Francisco, large parts of which are better than the bay area in every objective fashion other than this weird cult obsession with having to live in the poop filled streets of Silicon Valley.
cybersnowflake
|
6 years ago
|
on: California Approves Statewide Rent Control
"The fewer Republicans" et al
cybersnowflake
|
6 years ago
|
on: California Approves Statewide Rent Control
You having problems reading your past posts? You just basically said evil Republicans are blocking common sense housing solutions and indicated the solution is an even greater proportion of Democrats but then said that a Democrat blocked it and their numbers don't matter.
cybersnowflake
|
6 years ago
|
on: California Approves Statewide Rent Control
So you blame republicans and want even more Democratic control of the Legislature than they already have.
cybersnowflake
|
6 years ago
|
on: California Approves Statewide Rent Control
Ummmm...you do realize the Dems hold supermajorities in both houses right? Do republicans have psychic powers they're using to control the Dems now?
cybersnowflake
|
6 years ago
|
on: California Approves Statewide Rent Control
Also
2. Realize that not everybody in the world needs to or should live in the Bay Area/Hollywood.
3. Don't pass statewide laws catering primarily to the group of people aspiring to do so.
cybersnowflake
|
6 years ago
|
on: California Approves Statewide Rent Control
Yeah, thats why we're seeing oodles of houses now that the Democrats practically control all of california. Are you trying to argue that the current one party rule is a good thing?
cybersnowflake
|
6 years ago
|
on: California Approves Statewide Rent Control
The market's too high, lets implement market controls to keep prices at the market.
cybersnowflake
|
6 years ago
|
on: America’s aging population is leading to a doctor shortage crisis
Yep, everybody and their mother that I went to school with aspired to become a doctor. There should be absolutely no shortage. Getting to more reasonable numbers doesn't seem like it would worsen the already abysmal quality we're getting now with sleepwalking insanely overworked physicians.
cybersnowflake
|
6 years ago
|
on: Joi Ito Resigns from M.I.T. Media Lab After Outcry over Jeffrey Epstein Ties
People, happily do things like honor a holiday made by a man who sticks women's toes into vices, Think OJ is an innocent victim of systematic racism, and freely do business with some of the most repressive regimes. Just a few months back some of the same talking heads acting all high and mighty now were whining how Drumpf was hurting business with China. The same china which massacred a bunch of people in fairly recent events as tiananman square and memoryholed it to the point where even most americans aren't aware of it.
If people regularly overlook stuff like this without any shame, maybe possibly getting a massage seems pretty easy to overlook as well especially if you're getting a fat stack of cash.
cybersnowflake
|
6 years ago
|
on: Malicious attack on Wikipedia – what we know and what we’re doing
Maybe the damage will randomly improve the political articles and knock down some of the fiefdoms for a change. Couldn't get much worse...
nah dude you can downvote me a million times. I'm just asking politely why I'm and other people I see just stating unpopular opinions are being flagged, which is a more serious measure I hoped would be reserved for things a bit less subjective than 'immaturity'. But if it isn't nbd, I just hope to clarify things so everybody knows from now on. I mean its not like theres clear completely nonvague objective rules and spelled out consequences carved in stone in the easiest to find places.
"This is enough to get a down vote in my book. 2) An immature post. There are numerous signs, including the LOL at the end, that it's immature. 3) Fairly insulting to people who come here. 4)"
I've never personally insulted anyone here....as far as I remember. If you mean indirectly than well thats so subjective everybody here indirectly insults someone all the time.
"Your original comment is constantly begging the question. The reality is, you aren't interested in a discussion."
Not true, I am happy to engage anyone who wants to debate me. Like now, my history is open book for you to freely browse, show me something in it clearly refutes this, it actually stands as a clear testament to the opposite. If I am wrong on the hard facts I will acquiese. If you think its pointless well isn't all/most discussion on threads like these pointless?
" 5) "I'm just stating an unpopular opinion without any trolling, spam, or personal attacks" No, you aren't "just stating an unpopular opinion" if this keeps happening to you. If this happens to you constantly, it's because you are wrong. Your opinion of your comments is wrong for the community."
speaking of dismissing arguments.