dermesser's comments

dermesser | 2 years ago | on: The Rust I wanted had no future

I read this as wanting a different "feeling" for the language. Go uses this approach, with maps and arrays being baked into the syntax, and things work just fine. Implementing Vec in user code is rather the C++ "feeling".

Personally I'm happy Rust took the C++ route, it makes things more interesting, but I can see his point.

dermesser | 2 years ago | on: Why do railway tracks have crushed stones alongside them?

The rocks also need to be able to move a bit for elasticity, and have sharp edges. For that you also replace a part of the ballast every few years. That's hard to do when everything is sealed. Even with such "glue", the lifetime couldn't be eternal, after all.

dermesser | 2 years ago | on: Mojo – a new programming language for AI developers

Of course, but other than in C++ you need to use ways and means to achieve this - never hitting u compiled code - that are not very natural to Julia. Yes it may be possible to compile Julia code to binaries, but it obviously is neither straightforward nor widely used.

dermesser | 2 years ago | on: Mojo – a new programming language for AI developers

This is not true at all! Julia usually being JIT-compiled makes it very unsuitable for real time applications (and there's no reason why it should be great for it). GC is the least issue here, and I say that as a fan and daily user of Julia.

dermesser | 2 years ago | on: How close are we to the holy grail of room-temperature superconductors?

MRIs or anything with very high magnetic field requirements become a lot easier to build once you don't need to cool them down as much. Inversely, Generators etc. would benefit.

Magnetic levitation (Meissner-Ochsenfeld) would also not require such low temperatures.

Even Quantum computing using superconducting qubits might become easier (although there, superconductivity is not the main reason for low temperatures).

"Only" better conductivity is a big deal, after all.

dermesser | 3 years ago | on: The four-horse race to decarbonise steel

Had they done what you say, by now they still would not have decided on a location. Just look at the delays and cost overruns with Finland's reactor - and that's with popular support.

dermesser | 3 years ago | on: The four-horse race to decarbonise steel

Yes, the confusing issue is that iron-in-your-house or as a building material generally has a higher carbon content than steel, making the latter more elastic and less brittle (generally).
page 2