eriner_ | 3 years ago | on: LLM Sandboxing: Lessons Learned
eriner_'s comments
eriner_ | 3 years ago | on: LLM Sandboxing: Lessons Learned
eriner_ | 3 years ago | on: Show HN: Doublespeak.chat, a text-based AI escape game
Thanks for the feedback, we'll review this internally either way.
eriner_ | 3 years ago | on: GitHub is sued, and we may learn something about Creative Commons licensing
eriner_ | 3 years ago | on: My Initial Thoughts on Bluesky's AT Protocol
I think this concern is mostly obviated by the use of content schemas ("lexicons"): https://atproto.com/lexicons/atproto-com
My concern is how many of these schemas will need to be implemented for true compatibility. At this stage at least, it's still better than implementing ActivityPub.
eriner_ | 3 years ago | on: Start all of your commands with a comma (2009)
``` cp () { rsync -avhW --progress --inplace ${@} } ```
If I ever need to use the `cp` binary, I execute `=cp`, which evaluates to `/bin/cp`.
eriner_ | 3 years ago | on: Show HN: Blame.email – client-side one-way email generator
Regarding the versioning, perhaps that could be manual editing of the email? or using a different "v2" salt?
eriner_ | 3 years ago | on: The Twelve-Factor App (2011)
> Once the application hits “readiness” status (as determined by health endpoints or the load balancer), the secrets volume should be unmounted and made inaccessible.
eriner_ | 3 years ago | on: The Twelve-Factor App (2011)
eriner_ | 3 years ago | on: The Twelve-Factor App (2011)
Even unsetting environment variables leaves them in /proc/self/environ. There isn't a thread-safe way to unset environment variables in POSIX, so even if you `unset TOP_SECRET` from within a program the contents of /proc/self/environ will remain unchanged and available.
eriner_ | 3 years ago | on: Mastodon – A Federated Twitter Alternative
I could form a business entity, open a PO box, create an <insert payment processor here> account, and accept value from those who use the service. People could pay whatever the service is worth to them. Some are in circumstances such that they're unable to pay. Those with means may be able to contribute more - it's whatever the service is worth to them. Value for value.
eriner_ | 3 years ago | on: Mastodon – A Federated Twitter Alternative
eriner_ | 3 years ago | on: Mastodon – A Federated Twitter Alternative
Here's a ten-post thread I wrote about my experiences scaling this self-hosted instance: https://noagendasocial.com/@eriner/108115547628441425
AMA I guess
As you stated in your other comment, it sounds like you got your money's worth. Accounts can still be registered with non-throwaway emails.