flick's comments

Hey! I was at the last puzzle night (lot's of fun) and everyone at my table loved the game when you came around and showed us the website. I've been playing it a few times a week since!

Congrats!

Not so fast. See [1] and [2] for an explanation. There are good reasons to suspect that there are errors made in this analysis.

[1]: https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.02191

[2]: https://www.quantamagazine.org/no-dark-energy-no-chance-cosm...

What makes you think that ad blockers wouldn't also block contextual ads?

Are you Famine [1]?

1: https://wiki.lspace.org/mediawiki/Famine_(Good_Omens)

That doesn't make any sense. Using this logic you could argue that basically anything should have an eventual market cap of ~$1 trillion.

But the thing is that you (Bay Area landowners) are not really bearing the cost of insufficient housing. In fact, you're benefiting through increasing home values (for which you are not taxed due to Prop. 13). It's renters and others like Ms. James who are being hurt. The particularly cruel aspect of this is that once these people have been forced to the edges of the Bay Area, they no longer get to participate in the future decisions that will either exacerbate or alleviate this problem. Ms. James no longer gets to vote in Alameda, and thus has no say in the decisions that keep housing costs high and her commute long.

That's why I believe housing policy needs to be decided at the Bay Area or CA state level. When these decisions are made at the local level, it's people like your friends who selfishly vote to inflict the high costs of housing on to others. Hopefully this NIMBY-ism can be averted by making sure that all stakeholders get a say in the housing policy of a incredibly interconnected region.