geekpondering | 2 years ago | on: Apple Vision Pro: An Early Review by Andrej Karpathy
geekpondering's comments
geekpondering | 2 years ago | on: How to Replace Your CPAP in Only 666 Days
The other thing to remember about CPAP is that it's not just the machine, you have to get replaceable supplies - masks, air tubes, etc every so often.
While not nearly as bad as linked blog entry, my worst situation was with Kaiser in the SF Bay Area. I had gotten a CPAP through them and then a few years later moved to a different part of the Bay. I set up a new doc also with Kaiser, but the records don't easily transfer and since it's a different Kaiser respiratory team, I had to (of course) do another sleep study AND go through a CPAP orientation on how to use a CPAP despite me already owning and using a CPAP and just needing a new mask, etc.
geekpondering | 2 years ago | on: History of Vietnamese Typography
geekpondering | 2 years ago | on: Japan to introduce six-month residency visa for 'digital nomads'
Not out loud, anyway. The Dutch have an immigration system that very much benefits well off immigrants (see the 30% rule vs agricultural immigration schemes), but yeah Wilders is considered ultra-right wing for wanting to kick out all the lower class immigrants (saying that they are all "Moroccans" doesn't help matters). Unfortunately despite him saying the quiet part out loud he got 25% of the Dutch voters to agree with him in November.
geekpondering | 2 years ago | on: Japan to introduce six-month residency visa for 'digital nomads'
The three main things JP passport control are looking for are asylum seekers, people over and people that are illegally working under the table and not paying into the Japanese tax/retirement system.
geekpondering | 11 years ago | on: Big Banks Face Another Round of U.S. Charges
There's a difference between pricing inefficiencies and technology inefficiencies. In theory there should be equal access to markets. This is why SEC laws on disclosure exist. When people with greater technological ability can, in effect, toll everyone else, you are eliminating this idea of equal access.
> The HFTs are HIGHLY incentivized to not destabilize the market because they stand to lose a LOT of money if they make a mistake.
So are all traders, but that doesn't stop things like Enron and Lehman Brothers from creating smoking holes in our economy. When you start creating legal fictions and technologies that are barely understood by those that create them, much less those that provide executive oversight, government oversight, or the general public, you are getting into very dangerous waters.
Software only works as long as the assumptions of the programmer stay valid. HFT quants are incentivized to make their companies money, not to protect the market at large. An application on a desktop computer crashing and exhibiting weird behavior isn't a big deal. A HFT process going rogue is going to cost a company millions or billions of dollars at best.
geekpondering | 11 years ago | on: Big Banks Face Another Round of U.S. Charges
What if Buyer D isn't willing to spend $11?
"only serves to make a market more efficient"
I would say it's exploiting inefficiencies. That doesn't make the market any more efficient. In fact, given the sizable number of 'computer errors' leading to significant volatility when they occur, HFT is in fact a destabilizing force in the market at times.
geekpondering | 11 years ago | on: AIs are now re-writing history
geekpondering | 11 years ago | on: Big Banks Face Another Round of U.S. Charges
What is often happening is Seller A wants to sell something for $10. Buyers B, C and D submit an order to buy it for $10. The computer sees this, knows that it might be worth more than $10, and while Buyers B and C get their orders through, the computer buys it out from under Buyer D because their computers are faster. Buyer D now gets a notice that "oh, sorry, that thing you wanted is now $11."
It's the same thing as you overhearing your neighbor saying the Apple Store only has one iPhone left for sale at the Apple Store and, because you have a faster car than your neighbor, you get to the store and buy it and then offer it for resale at a higher price. That's not facilitating a transaction, and it certainly is perverting the market. When the people with the fastest computers and best geographical location get items cheapest, that's not a 'free market'.
Middle-men have classically existed to provide a _service_, adding value to a previously less valuable or more difficult transaction -- wholesalers or retailers. Wholesalers existed to pare down which goods are offered, and existed primarily because smaller retailers couldn't afford to purchase in bulk. Most 'middle men' of these classes have gone away due to the digital age and/or conglomeration. Grocery stores or websites that provide value by having multiple items in the same place that you can pay for all in one financial transaction.
geekpondering | 11 years ago | on: Big Banks Face Another Round of U.S. Charges
These "middle-men" are injecting themselves between buyer and seller to take their cut simply because they have the money, resources, and -- increasingly these days -- the geographic location to beat someone else to the punch.
geekpondering | 11 years ago | on: Twitter sues U.S. government over ability to disclose surveillance orders
Edward.
</pedant>
geekpondering | 11 years ago | on: SwiftOnSecurity: A story about Jessica
Some people don't see that as a 'cost', which is what many people in the tech industry don't understand at all.