geepeeyoudata's comments

>> No liquidity? He said the company went public… >> I know people don’t get the best deals on startup equity but something doesn’t add up here

Many startups stay private for 7-10 years. Most go broke, shut down, or have face-saving acqui-hires with no economic gain. If you leave at year 1,2,3,4,5, or 6 you have to pay UPFRONT to exercise the options and pay taxes UPFRONT. But you are stuck with private stock you cannot sell. In 95% of cases, the private stock can never be sold because the company goes broke. You dont know if your company, in year 7, 8, 9, 10, or beyond MIGHT be one of the lucky 5%

If you are going to spend $100k or $500k exercising options and paying taxes, you might as well buy QQQQ or NVDA or something with better odds of success.

>> So I'm not seeing what's wrong with this deal with the only caveat that the engineer has the experience not to overwork/burn out.

The startup can go bankrupt any moment, thats a big deal. You get crappy perks, often poor benefits.

>> What if they give 1-2% and good market rate salary (~200k/y) to a founding engineer? Is that still a bad deal?

OR....you could just become a founding engineer by actually founding and keep 90% of the equity. You can get that salary with an equity raise, its worth not being the low-person on the totem pole.

I worked at a Series A startup as an employee, and wont be doing that anymore. Early engineers have all the risk (lose job the second things go bad) but little upside. They would offer 500 options, or 1000 options, or 30,000 options -- but when you look at the prices, that was worth $100-$10,000. Why would anyone take all this risk, and lower base salaries for that lottery ticket?!

Secondly, they wont share the cap table, so you dont know what the denominator is. 30,000 shares of What!? No one would tell you. You should run.

Third, the VCs installed a buddy from SV as CEO who was creative with revenue. Great -- so they make their bonuses based on creative revenue, but the company gets saddled with VC rounds they have to dig out of w/o showing real revenue growth. Once you get SV insiders being placed into the company, often with their entourage of cousins and neighbors' kids as Director of HR or Director of Finance -- RUN FAST. The company is being strip-mined for cash, while Engineers slave away trying to code their way out of the wreckage left by locusts.

The C-Suite operated in a separate tier of the company with a heads-i-win-tails-you-lose setup. You could tell -- no way you are all driving Tesla Plaid on a "startup salary" -- the "startup salary" was for suckers, engineers, and those not in the VC-back-scratch loop.

My advice to everyone -- if you want risk, be a founder. Not Engineer #1 or #10. If you want balanced risk, go to a Series C or D company where you dont have the risk of fake accounting. If you want money, go to a public company with real accounting rules, visible revenue, visible liabilities, and more accountability.