imok20 | 16 years ago | on: XeTeX: A modern LaTeX with proper OpenType and Unicode support
imok20's comments
imok20 | 16 years ago | on: XeTeX: A modern LaTeX with proper OpenType and Unicode support
imok20 | 16 years ago | on: LaTeX vs. Word vs. Writer
imok20 | 16 years ago | on: When is a 9 inch pizza tha same size as a 12 inch?
(Regardless of how many are...)
EDIT: What's with the boom of posts demonstrating how stupid non-computer people are? It's rather elitist...
imok20 | 16 years ago | on: The Philosophy of Punk Rock Mathematics (interview)
e.g. Some say the set of natural numbers contain 0, some say it doesn't.
Granted, the kind of math being discussed here isn't open to much interpretation, but I thought I'd note it.
imok20 | 16 years ago | on: Canada beats the U.S.A., and Twitter beats the New York Times
imok20 | 16 years ago | on: Canada beats the U.S.A., and Twitter beats the New York Times
The NYT should focus more on investigative reporting and analysis, and Twitter should stick to being about getting information out there as fast as people can type. To each it's own, right?
EDIT: To those who downvote, I'm curious as to why you did; this makes a lot of sense to me, and I'd like to hear contrasting opinions.
EDIT2: I think I must not have been clear at all: I agree with the OP. Completely. I'm just saying that no, the NYT doesn't care about getting out information as soon as possible. BNO does, that's why they're slightly better than the NYT at it. Twitter delivers a little bit of news in small bites – for some, that isn't sufficient (and it isn't for me either, though Twitter is a nice heads-up for when I'm not watching the news). But bites of news can be transmitted in 140 characters, or at the very least they can contain links to news (such as, again, BNO's links.) I don't see the controversy here, but I suppose that must be the Twitter kool-aid.
imok20 | 16 years ago | on: Apple admits use of child labour in China
Right now, it's not clear what those conditions were; my comment was meant to address the only clear-cut part of this vague article: that 15 year-olds were working in a factory.
I'm not justifying poor working conditions, nor am I justifying overwork (though I find it interesting that we don't see it as criminal when professionals spend around 130 hours a week working.) I was simply astonished at the knee-jerk reaction so many have when children... gasp... work!
Substantiated claims that the working conditions of these children were poor can be addressed separately.
But, by all means, protect these children from feeding their families.
imok20 | 16 years ago | on: Apple admits use of child labour in China
The title is is misleading, as well: Apple contracts these oversea factories; they don't hire or force children to work for them. It's all a bit inflammatory.
imok20 | 16 years ago | on: Insanely deep fractal zoom
EDIT: Added "pixel on the screen".
imok20 | 16 years ago | on: Ask HN: How to beat the chicken egg situation with user-content driven website?
imok20 | 16 years ago | on: "On iteration": Why people leave Python
But I'm certainly ready and interested in moving toward a more functional language -- I've always been interested in the Lisps, and have always tended to write code in the functional style, where possible (even though my first language was Java...)
imok20 | 16 years ago | on: A flash platformer made in 48 hours by myself and 4 other people
imok20 | 16 years ago | on: PS3 Ring0 Exploit Released
imok20 | 16 years ago | on: PS3 Ring0 Exploit Released
imok20 | 16 years ago | on: TechCrunch Hacked
imok20 | 16 years ago | on: TechCrunch Hacked
imok20 | 16 years ago | on: Ask HN: My nephew wants to learn programming. What should I recommend?
Discovery is the most rewarding part of learning to program, and having fast payoffs is always nice to keep a kid interested. Worked for me (I started with Logo around his age, but Python/Ruby is way better.)
imok20 | 16 years ago | on: NYTimes to start charging for access to their website.
It astonishes me when people think this should be free. KNowledge should be free, yes, but news that costs money and much, much time to acquire and then disseminate _does_ cost money and I'm glad to pay for it.
This is high quality journalism from hard working people: asking them to do it for less and less is ridiculous. Content is tangible, to me at least, and worth money, just as a few lines of code "anybody" could write is also worth quite a bit.
imok20 | 16 years ago | on: Pirahã: a non-Turing-complete human language
This is an old article, but there are new ones a-comin'; the implications of Dan's work are just starting to be realized.