juecd's comments | WingNews

juecd | 7 months ago | on: Building an MCP Server with Clerk, Vercel, and Mintlify

As part of launching our MCP server, we wrote a short blog post about some of our technical decisions and limitations of the current landscape. The space still feels very early, so would love others' thoughts on the MCP space and what else is needed / how you think it'll evolve over time.

juecd | 8 months ago | on: Show HN: Live streaming for CUA models using WebRTC (OSS, Apache 2.0)

Thank you! Just saw your GH, will check out your WebRTC work more deeply :)

juecd | 8 months ago | on: Show HN: Live streaming for CUA models using WebRTC (OSS, Apache 2.0)

Oops, I forgot to add the link: https://github.com/onkernel/kernel-images

juecd | 10 months ago | on: Show HN: We Put Chromium on a Unikernel (OSS Apache 2.0)

The big motivation we had for trying to do this on a unikernel is actually the session pause/resume. The fast cold restart is a nice addition (or put the other way, a super slow restart would prohibit session pause/resume from being useful)

juecd | 10 months ago | on: Show HN: We Put Chromium on a Unikernel (OSS Apache 2.0)

Yes

juecd | 10 months ago | on: Show HN: We Put Chromium on a Unikernel (OSS Apache 2.0)

Yeah, this is mostly just an OSS implementation for self-hosting! I'm not entirely sure what any of those companies use under the hood, in theory they could use this implementation if they wanted to gain the fast boot times, session reuse etc.

juecd | 10 months ago | on: Show HN: We Put Chromium on a Unikernel (OSS Apache 2.0)

Haven't tried on a Lambda. Would be curious to know the results if you do!

It took us 8gb to get it up - maybe could be slimmed down if you took out the Anthropic Computer Use components, but browsers generally are pretty heavy.

juecd | 10 months ago | on: Show HN: We Put Chromium on a Unikernel (OSS Apache 2.0)

Are you referring to Unikraft Cloud's pricing? I'm not really sure, since I'm not affiliated. Maybe they'll chime in

juecd | 10 months ago | on: Show HN: We Put Chromium on a Unikernel (OSS Apache 2.0)

Yeah, there are some nuances to Unikraft Cloud that their team did to get it running. I'll see if they can chime in and shed some light!

juecd | 10 months ago | on: Show HN: We Put Chromium on a Unikernel (OSS Apache 2.0)

Thank you!

juecd | 10 months ago | on: Show HN: We Put Chromium on a Unikernel (OSS Apache 2.0)

Thank you! Yeah, the current implementation basically performs the same as a Docker container (i.e. not much). The interface is the same, so you can use BU/Playwright/Puppeteer's header configs to change as needed.

We did notice the unikernel cloud instances don't run into bot detection as often as our hosted docker instances, but I think that's mostly because Cloudflare haven't flagged Unikraft Cloud's IPs yet, hah.

juecd | 10 months ago | on: Show HN: We Put Chromium on a Unikernel (OSS Apache 2.0)

From what we've seen, micro VMs could probably do something very fast too (150ms?) but we thought 20ms was pretty crazy.

juecd | 10 months ago | on: Show HN: We Put Chromium on a Unikernel (OSS Apache 2.0)

Thank you!

juecd | 10 months ago | on: Show HN: We Put Chromium on a Unikernel (OSS Apache 2.0)

(OP) Happy to answer any questions! Some things we're still exploring:

- Mounting persistent storage for file i/o

- Replacing noVNC with a faster alternative

Would love feedback, especially if you’ve worked on fast-cold-start systems or unikernel-based infra.

juecd | 8 years ago | on: Scale API (S16) helps engineers outsource microtasks

Cool concept - what sorts of tasks are you hoping to do in the future?

juecd | 9 years ago | on: Scale (YC S16) Bounding Box API – Image Annotations by Humans via API

Your demo is awesome, nice job. Do you guarantee a certain response time?

Also, I'm curious how people use your API if it takes 30 seconds+ to get a response -- ie can I use this for time-sensitive annotations, and also, wouldn't my code hang waiting for your response or do you offer webhooks?

juecd | 9 years ago | on: Sway Finance (YC S16) Automates Accounting for SaaS Companies

Super good point that we've found with our customers who are migrating from outsourced bookkeepers.

We're using our Slackbot as a friendly way for companies to get their financial data, the idea being that if the numbers are accessible/convenient and ones they want to know (revenue, burn rate, bank balances). Then, we can use the same Slackbot to provide other necessary financial details.

We're still working on this, but we think Gusto does a great job of communicating necessary (and not so exciting) info in a way that engages us.

juecd | 9 years ago | on: Sway Finance (YC S16) Automates Accounting for SaaS Companies

Xero and Quickbooks just use basic regex to match transactions, which doesn't make much sense if the transaction category isn't static, eg Amazon. We also learn categories on an aggregate level, so if your bank statement's never seen a transaction from, say Tommy's Tacos, but someone else has, we'll be able to categorize it correctly immediately.

juecd | 9 years ago | on: Sway Finance (YC S16) Automates Accounting for SaaS Companies

For categorization, we're using ML (which learns over time and isn't rule based like Quickbooks' suggestions, which uses regex).

For the other pieces of bookkeeping, we're using integrations to automatically match invoices/payments (especially disjointed ones, eg invoice through QBO but pay separate via Stripe on client's website). We're also doing stuff like adjusting journal entries programmatically, like payroll accruals. For now, QB is providing the financial reports, we're doing the bookkeeping so their automated reports are accurate!

We're basically doing the services that a bookkeeper would provide on top of a client's Quickbooks software. QB is a tool and we aim to be a service.

juecd | 9 years ago | on: Sway Finance (YC S16) Automates Accounting for SaaS Companies

Right now, Quickbooks Online only. We can help switch to QBO if you're open to it!