lggdn | 6 years ago | on: Big Tech's Big Defector: Roger McNamee
lggdn's comments
lggdn | 6 years ago | on: The Yellow Fleet (2018)
lggdn | 6 years ago | on: Tell HN: Google should drop Quora from search results
lggdn | 6 years ago | on: Tim Berners-Lee unveils plan to save the web
"Free speech? Fundamental rights?" are what we want, but people who claim to want free speech and then claim they want "Support the best in humanity"? "Build strong communities"? ultimately mean that they want censorship.
It's basically what happened to social media and the internet. Remember that everyone from Reddit to Zuckerburg to news companies claimed they supported free speech a decade ago. Then money/politics/etc got involved and they started talking about ""Support the best in humanity"? "Build strong communities"?" and we have a censored dystopia on our hands.
In china, they use "harmony" as a propaganda tool to justify censorship. In the west, we use "civility" along with "best in humanity", "universal human rights", etc to justify censorship.
lggdn | 6 years ago | on: Tim Berners-Lee unveils plan to save the web
> That's because they have such strong motivations to keep things as they are, and even make them worse.
And the EU, Britain, US, etc don't?
I know it's hard to believe, the leader of internet censorship isn't in China, Russia or Iran. It's in europe.
"Germany’s Online Crackdowns Inspire the World’s Dictators"
https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/11/06/germany-online-crackdow...
And the leaders of tech censorship isn't in China, it's in the US since major tech companies are in the US.
If a Dem wins, the media/etc will praise tech/social media like they did after Obama won. Remember in 2008 when the media hailed Obama as the first "social media president". It's amazing how a single election shifted the narrative on an entire industry wholesale. It's like someone flipped a switch and the narrative went from positive to negative overnight.
How many remember Obama's Q&A at google?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nnj7r1wCD4
What would have been the narrative had Hillary won? Would tech be credited with helping her win rather than attacked relentlessly by the media? The real question that isn't why the news industry was so upset? Isn't the news supposed to be objective and fair?