loganabbott
|
3 years ago
|
on: Give up GitHub: The time has come
Publishing wrong information is wrong.
loganabbott
|
3 years ago
|
on: Give up GitHub: The time has come
That is correct. We informed SF Conservancy about this but they are so far unwilling to correct it.
loganabbott
|
3 years ago
|
on: Give up GitHub: The time has come
SourceForge CEO here. The first paragraph of this article is wrong. SourceForge has been built on Apache Allura since 2011.
https://allura.apache.org
loganabbott
|
6 years ago
|
on: Sunsetting Mercurial Support in Bitbucket
Most people have gotten the message that things have changed at SourceForge. We bought it to redeem the name and protect free open source software.
loganabbott
|
6 years ago
|
on: Sunsetting Mercurial Support in Bitbucket
We're a small independently owned private company, and not a single person responsible for those decisions made years ago is still involved with the company. It's been over 3 years since we bought SourceForge and we reversed all the bad decisions on day 1 and never looked back. We still support Mercurial
https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/documentation/Mercurial/#pub...
loganabbott
|
6 years ago
|
on: Sunsetting Mercurial Support in Bitbucket
loganabbott
|
7 years ago
|
on: A Brief History of SourceForge, and a Look Towards the Future
Nope it's still free and has always been free. And it's built on Apache Allura which is open source.
loganabbott
|
7 years ago
|
on: A Brief History of SourceForge, and a Look Towards the Future
Huh? Still completely free
loganabbott
|
7 years ago
|
on: A Brief History of SourceForge, and a Look Towards the Future
Hi, president of SourceForge here. Glad this is trending, albeit a few months later. These articles seem to trend on HN every few months, with many people not realizing SourceForge changed ownership in 2016 and that the new team's been working hard on improving.
To be clear, we had nothing to do with the bundled adware decisions of 2015, and when we took over in 2016, the first thing we did was remove the bundled adware, as well as institute malware scans for every project on the site.
We're working hard to restore trust, so if we win some of you back that would be cool. However, we're just focused on doing right by our million daily users.
loganabbott
|
7 years ago
|
on: Filezilla installer is suspicious again
We lost a few hours of commits and notified everyone affected. That's it.
loganabbott
|
7 years ago
|
on: Filezilla installer is suspicious again
FYI the SourceForge version of FileZilla is clean, and has been since 2016. The official FileZilla installer has been doing this for some time now though. In case people don’t know, a lot has changed at SourceForge since my company acquired them in 2016. All projects are scanned for malware. We covered the improvements again here
https://sourceforge.net/blog/brief-history-sourceforge-look-...
loganabbott
|
7 years ago
|
on: Filezilla installer is suspicious again
This blog post is not accurate at all.
loganabbott
|
7 years ago
|
on: Filezilla installer is suspicious again
FYI the SourceForge version of FileZilla is clean, and has been since 2016. The official FileZilla installer has been doing this for some time now though. In case people don’t know, a lot has changed at SourceForge since my company acquired them in 2016. All projects are scanned for malware. We covered the improvements again here
https://sourceforge.net/blog/brief-history-sourceforge-look-...
loganabbott
|
7 years ago
|
on: SourceForge's GitHub Importer
Thanks for the input. I am not trying to be insulting to anyone here. If it came off that way, I apologize. I am just, maybe too frustratingly, trying to get the point across that we are not the same as the previous owners. I understand why the name might confuse people though.
loganabbott
|
7 years ago
|
on: SourceForge's GitHub Importer
My point was not to be insulting, it was to draw attention to the fact that I don't know this person, just like most people don't know what's going on behind the scenes at SourceForge, or just how healthy we are as a company.
loganabbott
|
7 years ago
|
on: SourceForge's GitHub Importer
Sorry if my comments rubbed you the wrong way, but it's a bit frustrating when these threads pop up weekly, and people feel like it's open license to attack me and my company. We really are doing our best to make SourceForge a trusted destination, but still get the flack as if we were the previous ownership.
loganabbott
|
7 years ago
|
on: SourceForge's GitHub Importer
Well I do appreciate the feedback and valid questions. I will be putting some thought into it.
loganabbott
|
7 years ago
|
on: SourceForge's GitHub Importer
I'm not frustrated, but these threads show up on HN almost weekly now, with armchair quarterbacks who really are not current on the state of open source opining ill informed opinions. They even know we are new owners who immediately killed all the bad stuff, and still blame us. I cared about SourceForge, so I bought it and removed DevShare, and still get the blame. People know that we having nothing to do with the old owners, but recreational online outrage is fun, so they continue to blame us for saving it. Cognitive dissonance is en vogue right now. I guess if someone's lonely Sunday night is made better by shitting on the people who did everything in their power to save SourceForge, then go for it. I just think people's time can be used better.
loganabbott
|
7 years ago
|
on: SourceForge's GitHub Importer
Thanks. I appreciate it.
loganabbott
|
7 years ago
|
on: SourceForge's GitHub Importer
I don't think "attacking" means what you think it means. Why do you keep posting the same comment over and over?