m4tt | 14 years ago | on: Microsoft sues UK retailer Comet for selling over 94k counterfeit Windows CDs
m4tt's comments
m4tt | 14 years ago | on: Why I switched from Dropbox to Windows Live Mesh
m4tt | 14 years ago | on: LulzSec IRC leak: the full record
m4tt | 14 years ago | on: Admin of irc.lulzsec.org Arrested in UK
m4tt | 14 years ago | on: LulzSec supposedly claims its biggest coup yet: The entire UK 2011 Census
We are aware of the suggestion that census data has been accessed. We are working with our security advisers and contractors to establish whether there is any substance to this. The 2011 Census places the highest priority on maintaining the security of personal data. At this stage we have noevidence to suggest that any such compromise has occurred.
m4tt | 14 years ago | on: LulzSec supposedly claims its biggest coup yet: The entire UK 2011 Census
m4tt | 14 years ago | on: LulzSec supposedly claims its biggest coup yet: The entire UK 2011 Census
m4tt | 14 years ago | on: LulzSec supposedly claims its biggest coup yet: The entire UK 2011 Census
I contacted them a little over two hours ago, I haven't received a response, yet.
m4tt | 15 years ago | on: AmazonLocal
I'm guessing it is going to mix it up by offering deals from other services, whilst it builds up momentum to offer its own.
m4tt | 15 years ago | on: Instaplac.es - Instragram photos taken near you
m4tt | 15 years ago | on: Twitter in Talks to Buy TweetDeck
m4tt | 15 years ago | on: Google owns Googli.ng, Bing owns Bi.ng
m4tt | 15 years ago | on: Google buys UK comparison website BeatThatQuote.com for £37.7 million
I guess I could have worded that better, apologies for the confusion.
m4tt | 15 years ago | on: Exclusive interview with three individuals who hacked Gawker
From what I have found out, it looks like they used a vulnerability found within a three year old Minify script that hadn't been upgraded. This gave them access to other parts of the server:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-12-14/ga...
Don't quote me on that however.
“Comet has sought and received legal advice from leading counsel to support its view that the production of recovery discs did not infringe Microsoft’s intellectual property.
“Comet firmly believes that it acted in the very best interests of its customers. It believes its customers had been adversely affected by the decision to stop supplying recovery discs with each new Microsoft Operating System based computer. Accordingly Comet is satisfied that it has a good defence to the claim and will defend its position vigorously.”
I have updated the article to reflect this.