moreaccountspls | 5 years ago | on: $250k books sold, to save lives
moreaccountspls's comments
moreaccountspls | 5 years ago | on: $250k books sold, to save lives
It lessens it for the author because they're looking for validation from someone in some type of way, the same way the breakfast people do. If you're content being someone that needs validation from other people for your actions, then sure, it doesn't lessen it for them.
moreaccountspls | 5 years ago | on: $250k books sold, to save lives
It's a bit sad that you've taken a wonderful, altruistic act and cheapened it by feeling the need to broadcast it on the internet :(
moreaccountspls | 5 years ago | on: Go command support for embedded static assets (files)
No, it's not relevant. There's no considering being done, the feature is being shipped. Please stop with the Rust spam.
moreaccountspls | 5 years ago | on: Go command support for embedded static assets (files)
Nah, there's something unique about Rust zealots in this respect.
nicoburns comment is completely off topic, and it's extremely obnoxious to see this kind of thing over and over again from the Rust community. And I even like the language!
moreaccountspls | 5 years ago | on: Coronavirus doctor's diary: Why are people remaining ill for so long?
That's unfortunate. Try a different dermatologist? I've gone to flatiron dermatology in the past, and they're solid.
moreaccountspls | 5 years ago | on: All of us test in production all the time (2019)
I wish I could upvote this a thousand times. At the end of the day, it's all ego driven development. Nobody wants to think that their job has already been solved, and what's left is mundane and boring [engineering wise]. And so the business ends up with using a distributed log to handle a data set that could fit on a big thumb drive.
moreaccountspls | 5 years ago | on: All of us test in production all the time (2019)
Yes, but there at least is some genuine innovation going on. The backend frameworks are just churn for solving the same boring and lucrative business problems in new, fashionable ways.
moreaccountspls | 5 years ago | on: Coronavirus doctor's diary: Why are people remaining ill for so long?
Obviously you should do what you feel comfortable with, but now is a good time to go the doctor and get that checked out. The numbers are pretty low and stable for the moment. And FWIW, I had surgery last week so I'm not giving advice that I wouldn't follow myself.
moreaccountspls | 5 years ago | on: Bringing the print statement back
Alright, I'll bite. Why do you think not breaking users programs is abandoning quality?
moreaccountspls | 5 years ago | on: Grant Imahara Has Died
I very well could be wrong, but that's almost completely besides the real point [as well the self diagnosis regarding ADHD].
The amount of anxiety you're experiencing in your day to day life is grossly abnormal. I would suggest not waiting another day to start seeking out the help [therapy or working with a psychiatrist] you deserve. I also you suggest you research hallucinogenic medications as something to possibly relieve your existential anxiety: https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/media/releases/hallucin...
moreaccountspls | 5 years ago | on: Bringing the print statement back
> The lexer shouldn't have to deal with that sort of stuff.
The problem with that is that the entire python ecosystem had to deal with that instead...
I'm going way past rant territory at this point, but there's a reason that Microsoft and Amazon are worth a trillion dollars a piece, and it's not because of beautiful and elegant APIs.
moreaccountspls | 5 years ago | on: Bringing the print statement back
So what? In the history of Python, there was literally 0 bugs caused by print being a statement. Breaking backwards compatibility for shit like that is amateur hour.
edit: And just to be clear, I'm fine with making print a function for all new code. There were ways that the python community could have accomplished that [and the unicode switch] without breaking the entire language.
moreaccountspls | 5 years ago | on: Grant Imahara Has Died
It sounds like you're experiencing panic attacks.
moreaccountspls | 5 years ago | on: Linux kernel in-tree Rust support
Writing some optional, non-essential piece != rewriting a piece that will require taking rust as a dependency for the rest of time.
The kernel folks just did a lot of work to remove the strict dependency on GCC. To think any of the big players [Red Hat et al] want to turn around and make their shining star dependent on a language that's been 1.0 for less than 5 years is just not realistic.
moreaccountspls | 5 years ago | on: Linux kernel in-tree Rust support
Right, which is why it's a poor choice for the kernel at this time.
moreaccountspls | 5 years ago | on: Linux kernel in-tree Rust support
For the Linux kernel? Absolutely. Rust is way too unstable right now for such an important piece of software. Give it 20 years and a standard, then we can talk.
moreaccountspls | 5 years ago | on: Linux kernel in-tree Rust support
I wouldn't be too worried about it. The kernel people aren't going to take a dependency on something that isn't standardized and doesn't have a spec.
moreaccountspls | 5 years ago | on: Unit Testing Is Overrated
> not putting your engineering due diligence into delivering a product to the customer.
Yes. This is exactly what this person should do. Stop worrying about arbitrary rules and just deliver the damn product already. A hacky, shitty, unfinished product in your customer's hands that can be iterated on beats one that never got shipped at all every day of the week.
moreaccountspls | 5 years ago | on: Unit Testing Is Overrated
Sure. My point wasn't really whether to write unit tests or not. It's more, do what works for you / your team to enable you to ship consistently. For the OP, spending all of their time writing tests clearly isn't working for them if they haven't shipped at all.
page 1
My point is that by not acknowledging the selfish part of "wanting the credit", the author comes off as not self aware [or disingenuous, but let's give them the benefit of the doubt]. That's what I meant by cheapening it for them.