mufufu | 4 years ago | on: Show HN: A plain-text file format for todos and check lists
mufufu's comments
mufufu | 4 years ago | on: Zelensky video deepfake
mufufu | 5 years ago | on: “This tool works best on Google Chrome and mobile.”
mufufu | 5 years ago | on: Show HN: Rentify – Create an online rental store
mufufu | 5 years ago | on: Show HN: Skia-canvas, a browserless implementation of the Canvas API for Node.js
mufufu | 5 years ago | on: Why I don't give .edu discounts
I’m not sure I am following the point here. Are you suggesting people are signing up to a 4 year university, taking out tens of thousands of dollars in loans (as you mentioned) in order to get a student discount?
mufufu | 5 years ago | on: Why I don't give .edu discounts
mufufu | 5 years ago | on: ReMarkable 2.0 – A digital notebook that feels like paper
mufufu | 5 years ago | on: We Can Do Better Than SQL
I think the point he is trying to make here is the same as the post was making concerning orthogonality. Having a smaller set of special syntax, and therefore an easier validator to write, means easier queries to write for the user. I don’t think he was implying that everyone who makes use of the language should know how to write a lexer for it.
> The syntax is just not the interesting part. Any syntax that meets those criteria would do.
I have to disagree with this. If this was the case we would still be programming everything in BASIC or C because they’re just another imperative programming language and it gets the job done. Having sugar syntax, a consistent language, etc.. all makes it easier for a programmer (or data analyst) to get the job he needs quicker (and therefore reduces cost), makes a program easier to maintain, and so on.