ninjinxo's comments

ninjinxo | 9 months ago | on: Can a corporation be pardoned?

In Australia, if a company fails to nominate a speeding fine for a company car - either refusing or not maintaining records - then the fine is multiplied compared to that for an individual.

ninjinxo | 10 months ago | on: Jellyfin as a Spotify alternative

An N100 minipc or second-hand Dell Optiplex doesn't cost too much more than a rasp-Pi ($100-200), has a lot more power, and will only pull about 10W idle.

My optiplex shows as 8.191 kwh last month -> 11w average.

ninjinxo | 2 years ago | on: The Fill and Flush deplaning method

Better off watching CGP Grey's video "The Better Boarding Method Airlines Won't Use" which has more discussion of the topic, more simulations, and puts forward better methods that are either faster or allow families to remain grouped.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAHbLRjF0vo

This is basically https://arxiv.org/abs/0802.0733 but differs to the paper in that it doesn't consider: alternating odd-and-even row disembarkment, which would give passengers more aisle space to potentially speed-up luggage handling.

ninjinxo | 3 years ago | on: So You Want to Compete with Steam (2018)

To be fair, Valve were sued into enacting their return policy by the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC), and no longer offer flash sales because of it.

Linux support is nice though.

ninjinxo | 3 years ago | on: So You Want to Compete with Steam (2018)

No, dota has a paid subscription ($5 p/m) which gates gameplay features, many of which would be really useful for newer players - ingame coaching, item suggestions, hero pick suggestions, death summary, live gameplay tips, avoid player list, ranked mmr double downs that can be used after drafting phase, exclusive modes, and live spectating (free users have to use discord streaming or spectate with 2 minutes delay).

ninjinxo | 3 years ago | on: So You Want to Compete with Steam (2018)

You mean the company that pioneered:

Microtransactions, real money loot-boxes, gambling, NFT marketplace, battlepasses

doesn't milk it's users?

Dota used to have $35 "arcanas", a high quality skin for a single hero which were released intermittently - but that wasn't enough money, they're now placed $200+ deep in the yearly battlepass. If you played any of their games, you'd realise they're one of greediest in the business.

ninjinxo | 3 years ago | on: Galactic-Scale Energy (2011)

It's not profound to say that sustained (infinite) growth is unsustainable, but it is of interest when it's within a conceivable timeframe.

It's not worth reading however, because the author whimsically extrapolates energy usage starting from 230 years before the invention of the lightbulb to get their exponential growth argument which doesn't hold at all for modern data.

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.USE.ELEC.KH.PC?end=2...

ninjinxo | 3 years ago | on: DeepMind: A Generalist Agent

What is an ant to man, and what is man to a god; what's the difference between an AGI and an (AIG) AI God?

The more someone believes in the dangers of ai-alignment, the less faith they should have that it can be solved.

ninjinxo | 3 years ago | on: Think of a Number. How Do Math Magicians Know What It Is?

Since Peter is given the product of the two numbers, he should instantly know the pair if both numbers are prime, but since he doesn't it rules out pairs like (7x11) = 77 and (2x53) = 106.

Sandy knows the sum and has now been told that Peter doesn't know the pair. If the sum had been 6, the following pairs are possible: (1+5) (3+3) (4+2), Peter has just ruled out (1x5) and (3x3), so Sandy would be able to narrow it down to (1,5) if the sum had been 6.

So when she tells Peter she can't narrow it down, it tells him that the pair isn't (4,2) either (among many others).

And if Peter's number were 8: (1x8) or (2x4) he'd be able to solve it, but he doesn't so Sandy then knows that (1,8) isn't the solution either.

ninjinxo | 3 years ago | on: Think of a Number. How Do Math Magicians Know What It Is?

Reminds me of this problem:

Two numbers are chosen randomly, both are positive integers smaller than 100. Sandy is told the sum of the numbers, while Peter is told the product of the numbers.

Then, this dialog occurs between Sandy and Peter:

Peter: I don't know the numbers.

Sandy: I don't know the numbers.

Peter: I don't know the numbers.

Sandy: I don't know the numbers.

Peter: I don't know the numbers.

Sandy: I don't know the numbers.

Peter: I don't know the numbers.

Sandy: I don't know the numbers.

Peter: I don't know the numbers.

Sandy: I don't know the numbers.

Peter: I don't know the numbers.

Sandy: I don't know the numbers.

Peter: I don't know the numbers.

Sandy: I don't know the numbers.

Peter: I do know the numbers.

What are the numbers?

Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/32opae/next_level_che...

ninjinxo | 3 years ago | on: California grid set record of 97% renewable power on April 3

You're not adjusting for inflation (cash + increases in electricity costs), ambitiously assuming an equivalent 10% return on other investments, or re-investing the amount saved per year in your calculations (that $1650 you save in the first year also compounds to ~$16.25k).

Make those fixes and the numbers are much closer.

page 1