notbitter's comments

notbitter | 14 years ago | on: Later-stage rounds and “setting the bar too high”

Startups are risky to begin with, but raising a big round shifts the risk from founders to employees.

Based on the emails I get from recruiters bragging about how much money their companies have raised, it's clear that most engineers don't understand this, even if it's obvious to founders.

notbitter | 14 years ago | on: Three Types of Acquisitions

Talent ... As a rule of thumb, these acquisitions are priced at approximately $1M/engineer

Of which more than 90% will go to the founders and investors. The engineers being bought for $1M will be lucky to get $100K out of it.

Anybody out there want to justify or at least explain this practice?

notbitter | 14 years ago | on: Gowalla Founders v. Gowalla Investors

This is why Gowalla's investors are diversified across multiple startups. For them this is just one setback in a much larger game.

The people getting screwed here are Gowalla's employees, who put years of effort into a single project and whose options are now worth zero.

notbitter | 14 years ago | on: Equity Investment Simulation: Illustrating Dilution

Because the common stockholders don't have a seat at the table. Instead, when the company decides to sell, the execs fully dilute the common by granting themselves the remainder of the pool (with acceleration on change of control, of course).

notbitter | 14 years ago | on: Understanding How Dilution Affects You At A Startup

When investors talk about dilution numbers they only present the best case scenario, and this post is no exception.

If you really want to understand dilution, don't look at the best case. You need a graph showing your payoff as a function of exit size. Pay special attention to the range where liquidation preferences and multipliers kick in, because the sharks aren't going make you an infographic for that case.

page 2