I'm really anxious about this ambiguity of the "sexual harassment". This guy seems have no way to defend himself if in one of millionth chance that he is innocent.
People need information and actual cases to define the boundary. Just "common sense" is not enough. The way that MIT handles the information of investigation is really scary to me.
I know that smart guy does stupid things. However, a power that can punish people without going through court or public, isn't it scary?
Basically, an investigation conducted by a bunch of people behind the door does not hold more credits than an individual. Anybody has the same feeling?
People need information and actual cases to define the boundary. Just "common sense" is not enough. The way that MIT handles the information of investigation is really scary to me.
I know that smart guy does stupid things. However, a power that can punish people without going through court or public, isn't it scary?
Basically, an investigation conducted by a bunch of people behind the door does not hold more credits than an individual. Anybody has the same feeling?