rjerue | 4 years ago | on: Lessons on Writing JavaScript and React from ClojureScript
rjerue's comments
rjerue | 4 years ago | on: Lessons on Writing JavaScript and React from ClojureScript
Haha, the number of folks who have told me this! Yeah, probably a byproduct of the era I learned in. I just reach for the macro first, just what it's programmed into my head as
rjerue | 4 years ago | on: Lessons on Writing JavaScript and React from ClojureScript
The example is meant to be largely trivial. What if there were 50 cases I wanted to render.
On another note, I'd suggest ternaries with explicit null returns. Just need to get burned by it once to have it engrained! https://kentcdodds.com/blog/use-ternaries-rather-than-and-an...
rjerue | 4 years ago | on: Lessons on Writing JavaScript and React from ClojureScript
Bingo, IIFEs are and affront to god and nature. Ones in JSX arguably even more so. However, it's really the only way you can colocate all your display code to one part of a function.
rjerue | 4 years ago | on: Lessons on Writing JavaScript and React from ClojureScript
> I’d be very interested in a follow up blogpost after you’ve been at Reify for a year or two.
Me too!
page 1
- I'm new to Clojure, but did a lot for my formative work in Scala, and employed a pretty functional model using JS.
- While I really enjoy Clojure, I'll admit that JS is still my muse; it's the language that I dream in. React is the mental model I use to think of UIs. A perhaps naive summary may be that I'd give is what partly motivated me to write this is that JS and React are star crossed lovers. JS is by no means perfect, and I'd love to see it grow.
- I've been following elm for a while. It was after I met Jesse Tomchak from https://player.fm/series/javascript-to-elm at a conference a few years back that I started reading about it. When I tried it, the tooling wasn't quite where I wanted it yet and I'm a guilty of being a tooling primadonna.
- When I say I used JS, I really mean I used TS too! Speaking of being a tooling primadonna, VSCode's TS interop was a thing of beauty. Yes, it's 100% easier up front to look at a TS type and see what's going on compared to spec. I miss types. I think Clojure needs more in spec and for a large part, it continues to be neglected by the Clojure team. Spec vs. Types could be a whole essay/talk on itself.
- This isn't a call to action to use ClojureScript or Clojure. It's my critique of what I was using for years (and still will continue to use). Use what tools you feel most confident in to solve the problem in front of you.