rvrabec's comments

rvrabec | 5 years ago | on: Burning the Books: A history of knowledge under attack

Glad they explore what the modern day equivalent of burning books is... not a precise comparison but good to noodle on. "Ovenden sees myriad threats to knowledge amid this ‘digital deluge’. There is ‘linkrot’, those links that lead you to websites that are no longer available. There are denial-of-service-type cyberattacks, like the one that crippled Estonia in 2007, which see websites bombarded with queries, overwhelming servers and causing them to crash (even the Bodleian has been targeted). There is ‘fake news’, as well as ‘alternative facts’, and the manipulation or intentional erasure of data. Ovenden sees the emergence of ‘private knowledge kingdoms’ and ‘surveillance capitalism’ as particular threats: a ‘disproportionate amount of the world’s memory has now been outsourced to tech companies without society realising the fact or really being able to comprehend the consequences’."

rvrabec | 5 years ago | on: Show HN: Funding model for the web, users choose between ads or micropayments

Hi! Super cool extension for readers, seems easy for publishers too. I like that it isn't baked into the browser like the Brave BAT.

Just curious - what split have you seen so far between readers picking ads v micropayments?

Question before I try it out -How do you serve up ads? Are you a part of a network? I noticed you collect all data from sites with the extension, curious to know if the ad alternative is collecting my data and targeting me with personalized ads.

rvrabec | 5 years ago | on: Identifying People by Their Browsing Histories

"High uniqueness hold seven when histories are truncated to just 100 top sites." This is similar to the app finger printing they do with mobile phones, identify you by the unique assortment of apps on your device.

Should the top concern be about identification or deep collection of browsing history?

rvrabec | 6 years ago | on: A Taxonomy of Privacy (2006) [pdf]

"When we contemplate an invasion of privacy–-such as having our personal information gathered by companies in databases–-we instinctively recoil. Many discussions of privacy appeal to people’s fears and anxieties.9 What commentators often fail to do, however, is translate those instincts into a reasoned, well-articulated account of why privacy problems are harmful."

I came across a practical discussion of this on reddit -> https://www.reddit.com/r/privacy/comments/ez1tyo/how_do_i_co.... it's helpful but also befuddling.

rvrabec | 6 years ago | on: Twitter funding a team to develop an open standard for social media

Same concern - I'm working on getting some info removed from mastodon. it's terrifying how hard it is to get someone (volunteer mods) to actually remove something...

This sort of case makes me an advocate for centralized access to moderate/regulate/also be accountable... but then if there's this magic backdoor to data access and removal...?

rvrabec | 6 years ago | on: Personal and social information of 1.2B people discovered in data leak

Really interesting legal question - "Seems like the ball is with Google at the moment, the exposed data is on their GCP servers. So, they can figure out next steps." is a comment above. How will the chain of insecure infrastructure + the data scrapers + the people responsible for configuration react?

rvrabec | 6 years ago | on: Personal and social information of 1.2B people discovered in data leak

It's weird because for oxydata you have to contact their sales team... but peopledatalabs has an opt out form.

https://www.peopledatalabs.com/opt-out-form

People Data Labs privacy policy: 3. ACCESS TO AND CONTROL OVER INFORMATION A person may do any of the following at any time by contacting People Data Labs at [email protected]. People Data Labs will reply to a person’s request within five business days.

A. Access any information we have on them, if any.

B. Change, correct, or delete any information we have them, if any.

C. Express any concerns about People Data Labs using their information.

People Data Labs' team will act swiftly upon a person’s email request to change, correct, provide, delete, or explain anything a person query.

People Data Labs understands if a person would like to opt out of People Data Labs' database. Opting out will stop all data sharing and enriching of all PII in People Data Labs servers for that person. Click here, if you would like to opt-out, or choose to have all data about you removed from People Data Labs' database.

For https://www.oxydata.io/: Review and changes to your information Contact us at [email protected] to find out what information we have collected about you, and to request any changes to or deletion of it.

rvrabec | 6 years ago | on: DoorDash confirms data breach affected 4.9M customers, workers and merchants

For frustrated folks like myself who are also lazy like myself:

How to deactivate: https://help.doordash.com/consumers/s/article/How-to-deactiv...

Where to deactivate: https://help.doordash.com/consumers/s/contactsupport?languag...

*for what its worth, deactivation and deletion are mostly semantics if the point is to send a message to a company that their mismanagement erodes trust with users. "churn" is a metric that very much matters to executives and "deactivation" impacts that.

page 1