samg's comments

samg | 15 years ago | on: Chartbeat gets $3m from Index, Calacanis, Conway, Clavier, Sacca

Chartbeat is very cool, but I wonderful how useful it actually is.

Is the idea to modify content on the fly as it gains traction? I just don't really see how this service adds value (read: increases my revenue, pageviews, xxx), besides some nice live updating charts to look at.

samg | 15 years ago | on: Bill Gates's Playboy Interview (1994)

Interesting that in 1994 6.1 billion made you the second richest man in the country. And that Microsoft's $25 billion market cap is compared with Kodak.

samg | 16 years ago | on: Facebook.com overtakes Google.com as most visited USA domain.

They certainly do and deserve credit for not completely screwing them up. But besides keeping them running, has Google really done much to further either success? Blogger has remained pretty stagnate for the last few years. Would anyone here (looking for a hosted blogging platform, to keep things fair) choose Blogger for their blog today? Google has paid the bills for Youtube, granted (anyone know if Youtube is turning a profit yet?), but Youtube's success seems more attributable to its early-branding rather than any Google help.

samg | 16 years ago | on: New York Times Ready to Charge Online Readers

But remember one of their largest costs is also disappearing. Newspapers almost certainly lost money per copy by selling it for 50¢, and made up for it by selling ads. The problem will be selling that same metaphor of "copies" or subscriptions, when each additional subscription costs them next to nothing.

samg | 16 years ago | on: Google's first press release

"Software companies that want to change the world have to be free, at least initially."

Why? I can think of plenty of software companies that changed the world with a paid product (Oracle, Microsoft, etc.)

samg | 16 years ago | on: NetFlix Everywhere: Sorry Cable, You're History

One thing I'm struck by is how willing Hastings is to kill a a feature or product that isn't quite ready. They wait until the timing is right and then change the game. "No" (or, "not yet") is often the better answer.

samg | 16 years ago | on: The Next Generation Bends Over

I think the distinction isn't between family and friends- it's about the way different relationships work.

It would be okay to loan money to your parents or your children- there's a clear power relationship in both of these, of obligation both ways. It would be less okay to loan money to a sibling, where equal footing is a necessity for a healthy relationship.

page 2