sasavilic | 4 years ago | on: Google Is Forcing Me to Dump a Perfectly Good Phone
sasavilic's comments
sasavilic | 4 years ago | on: System76 Pangolin Linux-first laptop with AMD internals now in stock
But it is really hard to find notebook without numpad these days. Especially hard if it needs to work with linux out of the box.
sasavilic | 5 years ago | on: The Libet experiment doesn't disprove free will (2019)
sasavilic | 5 years ago | on: YouTube bans coronavirus vaccine misinformation
EDIT: IMHO, it would be much better option to flag/warn that video as misleading and provide link to resources with correct information.
sasavilic | 5 years ago | on: Running Postgres in Kubernetes [pdf]
One could argue that for sake of consistency you could run PG in K8S, but that is just hammer & nail argument for me.
But if you have a really good shared storage, then it is worth considering. But, I still don't know if any network attached storage can beat local attached RAID of Solid state disks in terms of performance and/or latency. And there is/was fsync bug, which is terrible in combination with somewhat unreliable network storage.
For me, I see any database the same way I see etcd and other components of k8s masters: they are the backbone. And inside cluster I run my apps/microservices. This apps are subject to frequent change and upgrades and thus profit most from having automatic recovery, failover, (auto)scaling, etc.
sasavilic | 6 years ago | on: German court bans Uber's ride-hailing services in Germany
sasavilic | 6 years ago | on: Billions wasted on Hadoop startups, the same will eventually be true of Docker
sasavilic | 7 years ago | on: Negotiations Failed: How Oracle Killed Java EE
sasavilic | 7 years ago | on: Linus Torvalds on Why ARM Won't Win the Server Space
All of this costs money, in terms of either having more developers/testers or having longer development time. So, in order to justify this investment, the second platform must be way cheaper in order to cover costs for extra developers/development time. And if there is a such huge difference and second platform works great, then why still have support for first platform anyway. Ditch it, and you will save yourself some money.
You could be an ISV, but again, your software will be more expensive if you need to support two different platforms. Which means that your customers must be willing to pay for it. Which brings us to same conclusion, unless there is a big saving by running software on alternative platform, nobody will care.
sasavilic | 7 years ago | on: Linus Torvalds on Why ARM Won't Win the Server Space
sasavilic | 7 years ago | on: The Nuclear Option
True, but it is still question of the half-life (i.e. plutonium)
> Obsessing over what could happen if somebody digs it up after 10000 years is not anchored in reality.
It is a reasonable concern, because we have never before in our history produced such toxic waste that lives so long. I don't know about you, but I do hope that Homo sapiens will survive next 10k years.
sasavilic | 7 years ago | on: The Nuclear Option
sasavilic | 7 years ago | on: The Nuclear Option
sasavilic | 7 years ago | on: The Nuclear Option
sasavilic | 9 years ago | on: Ask HN: What do you want to see in Ubuntu 17.10?
HEADLINE: Better (more polished) HiDPI support (also for legacy apps)
DESCRIPTION: I am running on 16.04 so I might be missing same latest fixes. But, some applications (especially Qt application like VLC player) have the issue with HiDPI monitor. Moving app between HiDPI and non-HiDPI monitor required restart in order to get correct sizing.
Apple used to look expensive to me, but if I divide initial cost per number of year of device exploitation, it actually gets cheaper then Android devices.