shartstorm92
|
2 years ago
|
on: Sal Khan: How AI could save (not destroy) education [video]
This is gross posturing and indicates future rent seeking behaviour. Imagine getting in front of people and telling them that some corporation trained the font of wisdom, and that you'd be happy to charge fuckin' admission! What absolute dogshit. All that future rent seeking for a glorified DAN prompt. This is the digital equivalent to making everyone do bullshit jobs because we never figured out how to deal with increased worker productivity from manufacturing.
shartstorm92
|
2 years ago
|
on: RoboAgent: A universal agent with 12 Skills
Well done, dudes! If I wanted to get my hands on a robot that could be used with this, where should I look? Exciting times.
shartstorm92
|
2 years ago
|
on: Releasing my tools under the MIT License was probably a mistake
The GPL doesn't allow you to charge for access to the source code. Redhat will remove your right to future updates of the code if you exercise your GPL rights and share the source code from a release. The code you share will still be GPL'd, but you get kicked out of the club. Inb4 that is functionally the same as charging for code. No, it is holding future code hostage based on not exercising your rights. This goes against the spirit of the GPL, and we should fork it and just do something else after getting kicked out of corporate propaganda network, aka Redhat. Corporatists, all of em. They aren't doing GPL really. They will end up pulling out of the GPL in a future release anyway. Might as well cut our losses. Too much hand wringing about it, just say the truth about them.
shartstorm92
|
2 years ago
|
on: Bombe: Minesweeper, but you only solve each situation once
I like this! It reminds me of Zachtronics, specifically Exapunks. I will make sure to grab a copy. Gameplay is important to me, so I hope that it plays well. I'm curious is there is a solve state. We will see.
