shuspect | 6 years ago | on: Why the foundations of physics have not progressed for 40 years
shuspect's comments
shuspect | 6 years ago | on: Why the foundations of physics have not progressed for 40 years
I'm trying to explain quantum physics using single photo[0] (in Ukrainian, but you will get it). It has good adoption among regular people. It based on real physical experiment, just labels are added. BUT scientist are insane when they see it. They argue that quantum physics cannot be explained using picture, because the only true way to explain quantum physics is using mathematics.
[0]: https://scontent.fiev21-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/79956387_10...
shuspect | 6 years ago | on: Why the foundations of physics have not progressed for 40 years
"Height field" is mathematical model of land.
Electromagnetic filed is mathematical model of what?
shuspect | 6 years ago | on: Bash $* and $@ (2017)
Just do it.
shuspect | 6 years ago | on: Evidence that the key assumption made in discovery of dark energy is in error
Number of red dwarfs is really astonishing: https://youtu.be/LOJ1XmbSKhM?t=1125
Tolman surface brightness test now looks much brighter. ;-)
shuspect | 6 years ago | on: Evidence that the key assumption made in discovery of dark energy is in error
Calculate our speed against CMB. Calculate their speed agains CMB. Compare. It's easy.
shuspect | 6 years ago | on: Evidence that the key assumption made in discovery of dark energy is in error
Look there: http://irfu.cea.fr/dipolerepeller
page 1
A kind of Pilot Wave can explain quantum weirdness to layman people with ease.
We can ditch theory relativity and calculate speeds relatively to CMB, which is much easier to understand.
We can ditch Big Bang theory and, instead, accept that light is not immortal, because it ages with time. IMHO, Dipole Repeller and Shapley Attractor are much more attractive and easier to explain than Big Bang.