stonesixone's comments

stonesixone | 5 years ago | on: Fox News Is Sued by Election Technology Company for over $2.7B

> If anyone in government really wants to have a notable legacy, here's how: petition the USDS to create an integrated open-source election system, and get people like Matt Blaze and Harri Hursti to run a red team against it.

Check out the nonprofit VotingWorks, which is far along in already doing this: https://github.com/votingworks For example, their system has been used in Mississippi in real elections.

stonesixone | 7 years ago | on: Private equity controls the U.S. voting machine industry

No, Los Angeles County's new tabulator isn't open source. Look what happened when someone tried to request the source code for their "open source" system (as LA County's press release called it). LA County replied that it's "exempt from disclosure" for a whole host of reasons (2 pages worth):

https://osvtac.github.io/files/meetings/2018/2018-09-13/pack...

https://osvtac.github.io/meetings/2018/2018-09-13/agenda

In contrast, the City and County of San Francisco is working on developing and certifying an open source paper-ballot system.

stonesixone | 8 years ago | on: The Meta-Problem of Consciousness [pdf]

> I don't think you need to invoke an essentially mysterious "conscious" property of the mind to explain that.

I don't think consciousness is being invoked to "explain" any of the things you list. The issue to explain is why we observe consciousness existing or accompanying these things in the first place (for ourselves). For example, one can imagine a system capable of referencing itself, choosing actions based on that, etc, that isn't conscious. That's a philosophical zombie. So the question is why aren't we all philosophical zombies.

stonesixone | 8 years ago | on: General and Surprising

There's also a class of valuable insights that are general and not surprising, but rather obvious. For these, the challenge is that no one previously had the insight to observe and state what is obvious. Maybe the surprise for these isn't in the truth but rather that no one had stated them before.

stonesixone | 8 years ago | on: Maryam Mirzakhani’s Pioneering Mathematical Legacy

My memory may be a bit fuzzy on this. But I believe one way the term "dynamics" is used in her work is in reference to the space of Riemann surfaces (or equivalently, the space of hyperbolic geometries on a surface). This space is called moduli space. Certain topological operations on the surface (e.g. twisting a "handle") give rise to a corresponding transformation on moduli space. So one of the things mathematicians in this area can study is the dynamics of such operations on moduli space. This means, for example, studying the behavior of these operations on moduli space, in the limit.

Also, to a mathematician, "dynamics" can often simply mean studying the behavior of iterations of a single function from a space to itself. So the parameter "t" in this case is over the positive integers (or all integers if the function has an inverse).

page 1