thatoldfool | 3 years ago | on: Ask HN: What is your replacement for Google search
thatoldfool's comments
thatoldfool | 3 years ago | on: The indie web is dead, long live the indie web (2019)
thatoldfool | 4 years ago | on: Ask HN: What are your favorite newsgroups on Usenet?
I have a hefty block account that's my primary server, and then a TB of block data from other backbones set to be only used when my primary server is missing data.
thatoldfool | 5 years ago | on: To Delay Death, Lift Weights
thatoldfool | 7 years ago | on: Things Every Learner Needs to Know About Effective Learning
thatoldfool | 7 years ago | on: Things Every Learner Needs to Know About Effective Learning
If I had imagine a way in which the two could work together, it would be for Polar to be able to read from the Zotero library.
Are you guys on speaking terms with the Zotero team?
thatoldfool | 7 years ago | on: Things Every Learner Needs to Know About Effective Learning
thatoldfool | 7 years ago | on: Things Every Learner Needs to Know About Effective Learning
thatoldfool | 7 years ago | on: Things Every Learner Needs to Know About Effective Learning
The paper I linked is the shortest one on the topic, and you're right, it doesn't have all the info for those that want to go deeper.
Again, my claims are that: 1. Ebbinghaus's Forgetting Curve is real, although probably not as bad as he/we thought (two latest papers that I have on it: DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2010.08.009, DOI: 10/f7vfcn); 2. Spaced Repetition is the best way to beat Ebbinghaus's Forgetting Curve for most people (I read a bunch of articles--the DOI's I still have saved are the following, but I can't remember which papers were better than others - DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x, DOI: 10.1177/1529100612453266 <-this one is the one on which the article I linked is based, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/stl0000036).
I could look for more, I haven't had to prove this for a long time, however, like I said, I love to be wrong (especially since I use this for my students, so if there's a better way, I'd like to know!). Do you have any links to studies that contradict 1. Ebbinghaus's Forgetting Curve and 2. Spaced Repetition as the best way to learn facts?
Cheers man, I'm happy you forced me to dig up these papers :)
-TOF
thatoldfool | 7 years ago | on: Things Every Learner Needs to Know About Effective Learning
thatoldfool | 7 years ago | on: Things Every Learner Needs to Know About Effective Learning
As an elementary school teacher and a MSc Psych student, I can tell you that spaced repetition is the best way for learning facts. And it's not just my fancy - here's one of the many studies that prove it:
"Practice tests, spaced practice, and successive relearning: Tips for classroom use and for guiding students’ learning." http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-13426-004
You can google the paper and get it free online.
While we're at it, learning styles are not a real thing: https://digest.bps.org.uk/2018/04/03/another-nail-in-the-cof...
If you need more proof, just read the papers in the references.
If someone asked me what the two most important things for an average person to know about learning, it would be that 1. Ebbinghaus's "Forgetting Curve" is real, and you will forget most things that you learn within 30 days if you don't review them properly and 2. Spaced repetition, especially aided by software such as Anki, is the best way for the average person to learn and retain large amounts of information.
Now, if one is keen, you can upgrade you learning with the use of mnemonics, both mental and visual, and drawing things helps immensely: https://digest.bps.org.uk/2018/11/22/the-act-of-drawing-some...
But for the average person that won't put in the extra effort, 1. Ebbinghaus's Forgetting Curve and 2. Spaced Repetition are probably the most important things to know about.