thomasrockhu | 2 years ago | on: Interesting Bugs Caught by ESLint's no-constant-binary-expression (2022)
thomasrockhu's comments
thomasrockhu | 2 years ago | on: Launch HN: Sweep (YC S23) – A bot to create simple PRs in your codebase
Tom from Codecov here. This is so true, 80% is usually a much more reasonable approach. It’s better to write good tests than all the tests.
(Shameless plug) I wrote a short post about this here: https://about.codecov.io/blog/the-case-against-100-code-cove...
thomasrockhu | 3 years ago | on: Bringing Codecov into the Sentry Family: Where Code Coverage Meets Am
Tom from Codecov/Sentry here. Thanks so much! We're very excited to be here.
thomasrockhu | 5 years ago | on: A starter-kit for your PHP [#opensource] project(travisCi, badges, codeCov,etc.)
Tom from Codecov here, looks awesome! Thanks for building this out.
page 1
I'm a huge proponent that branch coverage is way more important than just statement coverage, because as you mentioned, it's way easier to miss these types of bugs just by getting 100% statement coverage.