tigertigertiger's comments

My fault, for some reason I had the Euro Chart which had 0.83€ as all time low.

DAI is far from it's lowest point right now.

I'm working a lot with Google ads and when I tested ChatGPT it was just not able to limit their output to a certain number of characters. It always failed to give at max 90 characters. When I tell it, that it used more, it apologizes, gives another output and makes the same mistake.

Not for a scala dev and not for someone with his experience, that's just wrong.

Both models, imagen and parti didn't had a problem with text. Only dalle and stable diffusion

Crazy that I had to scroll this far to read this. This diet is crazy good at losing muscle mass. Atleast you can lose kg at doubled speed.

The topic was about loans. How often do you need a loan for under 1k dollars?

The difference is obvious. If they steal a Mercedes it's gone, the car dealer does not have it anymore.

You are the only one that got the problem. I was wondering why even the author of the article got the problem wrong. A perfect logican always needs a 100% chance for stopping the game. Each message could either be: a) the exact same strategy b) the same strategy with a small variance that is also reasonable c) a completely reasonable other strategy d) just a color e) waiting or something unrelated to the problem itself

The problem is that every proposal of a-e could get matched with something a-e that ruins it.

Examples:

1. I say just a color, they say just a color. You stay by the color they also stay, you decide to switch they also do it at the same time.

2. You propose something to confirm, so did they and we are back at 1.

3. You decide to do something random and they also decide to do something random with the same outcome

Since you are both perfect logical, you will realize that, making any try obsolete.

So you could try to get to know each other and just chat to something unrelated but there is still the problem that they could exactly mirror your messages again.

So you both come to the conclusion that there is no 100% strategy. You could now decide that you should continue playing the game forever or decide that a strategy with less than 100% is good enough.

Both have etablished now that using a meta strategy to agree on something is just a waste of time, because of a-e and we can just stay on the main layer. Repeating the color is also useless because the other might have the same strategy. So the only solution would be to announce just random colors and as soon as they match we end the game and are free. Theoretically they never have to match so the game could just go forever (hence it's not 100%).

Yeah I can't keep track about the weekly times the whole internet went down. Probably a couple of times a week

That's the way games work.

Doesnt having a good memory give advantage to chess players?

Or having good reflexes benefit shooter player?

Except for the fact that YouTube already has a membership model for creators on top of their ads model, so you can be a paid subscriber (which includes other benefits) on YouTube too to support your favorite creators.

Not really, because they met at different times.

>Dai was battle tested and proven under the worst possible scenarios

Yes and it failed horrible and resulted in 9 million dollars loss because of a design flaw:

https://blog.makerdao.com/the-market-collapse-of-march-12-20...

Lol at 2%. Not even 2% of devs in silicon valley could do that.

Thanks that's a very good point and definitely a new perspective

Well I did it. I made art myself, even special one. I made one of the biggest perler bead art in europe with about 70.000 beads (maybe even the world?). Would I appreciate my artwork? As some kind of skill - yes (having immense duration and boredom), as something that has a special intrinsic variable beside being bigger than other pieces - no.

I'm aware that every skill and talent takes some kind of luck to "make it". I just say that art lacks any objective qualities and is just based on choices of some elite circle that don't even match public opinion.

Of which kind of music are we talking about? If you mean some art of abstract music or music that gets approved from some elite circle, I would indeed make the same arguments and don't see a flaw.

My main point is that there is no objective comparison between thousand of pieces and when we take the choices of the elite circle and compare it to intersubjective choices of the masses there would be little to no overlapping. So my point would still be "Why is your elite opinion more worth or correct than the collective opinion of the whole world?"