vbit | 9 years ago | on: Komodo X released – new version of Komodo IDE
There is also the reduced feature free version called Komodo Edit: http://komodoide.com/komodo-edit/
vbit's comments
vbit | 9 years ago
Very exciting! How can I join? :D
vbit | 10 years ago
+1
Or you may want to allow a one-click solution that I can deploy on my resources now and later seamlessly move to your hosted solution, when I need to scale.
vbit | 10 years ago
Very cool, thanks!
vbit | 10 years ago
Having tried it briefly, looked much better than Atom!
I would use it at work if I could turn off the phone home feature.
vbit | 10 years ago
BTW, does rust come with some kind of ide support tools, e.g. a commandline tool for autocomplete?
vbit | 10 years ago
I agree with you that session persistence is generally lacking in a most of these tools.
I there an editor/IDE you use that gives you the persistence?
vbit | 10 years ago
Whoa - thanks! I did not know this.
Do you use this and can you say something about production readiness/stability?
vbit | 10 years ago
How stable is FreeBSD on AWS?
Would you recommend it for production use?
Is there a suite of compatibility/performance tests that is run on AWS for each release?
vbit | 10 years ago
DigitalOcean is FreeBSD friendly too.
vbit | 10 years ago
Copyright is different and enforceable - see what RIAA did to some downloaders.
vbit | 10 years ago
Not illegal perhaps but violates the TOS
vbit | 10 years ago
For a non-vim user - can you describe what vimdiff is please?
vbit | 10 years ago
Why is it a dumb policy?
vbit | 10 years ago
Is your editor publicly available?
vbit | 10 years ago
The parser will match the specified grammar exactly, like it should. You could of course specify a grammar that is broader than the actual language you are parsing.
vbit | 10 years ago
In spite of drivers being non AGPL, companies with 'absolutely no AGPL' policy cannot try the open source version of these DBs which puts these products behind others. I don't think AGPL provides any real benefit for the vendor. Most small organizations will want their patches (if any) to be upstreamed so they don't have the maintenance burden. Most big organizations will want commercial support anyway. All AGPL does is discourage adoption.
There are plenty of non-AGPL DBs out there doing pretty well. Here are some examples of GPL/MIT/BSD style licensed DBs: Riak, Cassandra, Redis, MySQL, PostgreSQL, ArangoDB, CouchDB.
vbit | 10 years ago
AGPL is real show-stopper for serious adoption, IMO.
vbit | 10 years ago
Seconded. LuaJIT FFI is just awesome. Check out the motivating examples: http://luajit.org/ext_ffi.html
BTW, does anyone have recent benchmarks comparing LuaJIT against new versions of the Javascript JITs?
vbit | 10 years ago
I agree with you. In fact I think the reason we have to do squashes and lose fidelity is because the git model is broken.
There is not technical reason a source control tool could not offer multiple 'views' into the commit history. A high level linear view which you can zoom into to see the underlying commits and merges. Why do I have to lose the latter to see the former?