westernaccess's comments

westernaccess | 7 months ago | on: A literary prize judged by AI

Of course, the banana example would be scored poorly almost instantly, and any recognitions of canonical work are flagged.

The prize is nonetheless in good faith.

westernaccess | 7 months ago | on: A literary prize judged by AI

I created a prize for short fiction with a $3500 prize pool, judged entirely by AI.

In short, the first stage of evaluation gets passed through four small models based on 21 literary criteria. If there’s agreement between the models, or if the first pass scores particularly well, the work is promoted to the second stage. Here, seven sub-agents which specialize in groups of the above criteria give two passes on the work. If the same scoring evaluations are met, all of the previous results are added to contexts for larger, thinking models to give a final score.

Currently, submissions are limited to short (2000 to 20,000 words) literary (not genre) fiction.

Once the submission period ends, and prizes are awarded, I’ll be opening it up for anyone to use.

westernaccess | 1 year ago | on: Working Methods (of a Historian)

I was expecting a bridge to some form of knowledge management, given the brief reference to personal wikis and databases, plus the fact that HN loves to debate the various methods of the above. But I was happily surprised to see nothing of the sort. The author's resignation that his practical research methodologies are no doubt outdated and inefficient was a breath of fresh air.

I often find myself spending far too much time fearing that the methods I've chosen in any kind of research are faulty, which turns out to be much greater time sink than actually just absorbing the material at hand.

An analogy: time spent planning what to do with your friends/family would be better used just being with them. Likewise, becoming closer to a historical subject--whether by immersing yourself in all the relevant material or by literally imagining yourself alongside them--will return more valuable results long-term than by running a scientific experiment about them.

The tour guide is wiser than the city planner!

westernaccess | 2 years ago | on: AI still doesn't understand memes

I think ChatGPT wasn't able to interpret the final diagram of the double slit experiment, rather than the meme as a whole. I wonder what the output would be if the input was just that diagram.

That said, I agree with the overall sentiment: IMHO, LLMs won't ever be able to parse culturally dense and community specific information, like memes, because the goalposts are always moving. That goes for humor in general, I suppose. I think that's a good thing for humans

westernaccess | 2 years ago | on: Building an app to learn languages with short stories

Just because a children's story, for example, is "simple" doesn't mean it isn't inflected by human complexities.

When you're learning a language, your brain is going through a unique process of both attention to small detail and rote memorization. If you see a pattern often enough at an early stage of language learning, you'll most likely carry that with you at later stages. Even if you don't notice it at first.

Would you trust an AI to present you with accurate language patterns--speech, vernacular, etc?

westernaccess | 2 years ago | on: Building an app to learn languages with short stories

Totally agreed. I'm biased because I learn languages to mostly read texts in original languages. Narratives with well-crafted prose can have hundreds of years of linguistic and stylistic histories, as well as contemporary vernacular, which can tell more about a language than just understanding the plot of the story. I don't think that can ever be fully replaced by an LLM.

There are thousands of short stories at every level of language understanding for nearly every language in existence. I would be more interested in using AI for the languages that don't have these. (say, endangered/extinct languages, oral languages, etc)

westernaccess | 2 years ago | on: The Mystery of the Bloomfield Bridge

I really enjoyed this write up . Reminds me of projects in NYC like Urban Archive [0], at a microscopic level

I really wish this kind of snooping was incentivized more. It’s a great way to engage your community. Something I think many younger people, and especially those working remotely, can miss. (Myself included). Asking specifically “why” something exists is a great heuristic.

Side note—-if you’re ever traveling in Europe, try to find a Henry Holt Walks Series book for whatever city you’re in. They’re older (usually late 90s to early 00s), but they go into meticulous historical and narrative detail of overlooked sections/buildings/plaques/etc of otherwise very touristic cities. Will undoubtedly send you into a deep and labyrinthine rabbit hole

[0] https://www.urbanarchive.nyc/

page 1