wirefloss
|
10 years ago
|
on: 37M Americans don’t use the Web. Here’s why you should care
Having myself been invited to join AARP (the most powerful lobby in US, google it) for a few years now I can attest that unfortunately some old people just can't learn internet, even ones with strong engineering background and otherwise highly functional today. What happens to today's users in their eighties only time will tell.
wirefloss
|
11 years ago
|
on: SS7: Locate. Track. Manipulate [video]
Yep. I tried to avoid mentioning this in a polite company :).
wirefloss
|
11 years ago
|
on: SS7: Locate. Track. Manipulate [video]
I finally found the way to watch the presentation (BTW it's good), and the author mentions femtocell hacking as "if you hack femtocells you _may_ have a chance to have access to SS7", or something like that, i.e. very uncertain. He emphasizes a different method -- getting a "global title". That's what I meant in my original comment -- you have to join the telco club, and that is not trivial.
wirefloss
|
11 years ago
|
on: SS7: Locate. Track. Manipulate [video]
The Verizon vuln referenced above seems has nothing to do with SS7. Femtocell is rooted, and only cell phones in a close proximity are vulnerable. I thought the presentation in Hannover deals with a much broader issue. And yes, femtocell may be potentially a gateway to the remote hacking of MSC, HLR, etc. Unfortunately I have not seen the presentation, so I can't be sure what it's about.
wirefloss
|
11 years ago
|
on: SS7: Locate. Track. Manipulate [video]
All TDM and Sigtran signaling links of world-wide SS7 network are configured manually peer-to-peer. The signaling traffic including SMS texts travels mostly unencrypted. Hence it's next to impossible to get a real SS7 Pcap log (requires an NDA), let alone access to the SS7 network, unless you work with a network operator.
wirefloss
|
11 years ago
|
on: SS7: Locate. Track. Manipulate [video]
On Comcast. Can't see anything either.
wirefloss
|
11 years ago
|
on: The Rise of Men Who Don’t Work – And What They Do Instead
The only remarkable thing about this NYT article is that it appeared at all. Read Charlse Murray "Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960-2010".
wirefloss
|
11 years ago
|
on: The Man Who Made Tetris
The guy graduated from the same high-school a few years ahead of me (Moscow School 91). Me and my classmates had our ears full on how great he was from our homeroom teacher (yes, we had them in high-school). We were the bunch of pre-selected math wiz kids, but whatever we did, we often heard from the our homeroom lady "You are not Lesha Pazhitnov", or "Lesha did this...". We didn't quite know who he was, but hated him nonetheless :). This was way before he made Tetris.
wirefloss
|
11 years ago
|
on: WireEdit – A Full Stack WYSIWYG Editor for Network Packets
Correct.
wirefloss
|
11 years ago
|
on: WireEdit – A Full Stack WYSIWYG Editor for Network Packets
You can now download the .msi installer separately. Not sure it'll make Chrome happy. If you want the folder with Pcap example files, download Ubuntu version, and tar xvf it. It still has the examples folder inside.
wirefloss
|
11 years ago
|
on: WireEdit – A Full Stack WYSIWYG Editor for Network Packets
It's not. I use Chrome all the time. It may be the zip file which spooks it. The zip contains an .msi file + a folder with pcap examples. If you wait a couple of hours, I'll put a separate .msi for download.
wirefloss
|
11 years ago
|
on: WireEdit – A Full Stack WYSIWYG Editor for Network Packets
You can install from any folder, not only your home folder. Most package installations under Linux do require sudo privileges, so WireEdit is in no way unique. You password is SAFE. Really. The README is trying to be pretty upfront about what it is, and how it works. See also my replies to other questions here.
wirefloss
|
11 years ago
|
on: WireEdit – A Full Stack WYSIWYG Editor for Network Packets
Yeh. I added it after the above question was asked. It was asked once, so it obviusly belongs to a FAQ.
wirefloss
|
11 years ago
|
on: WireEdit – A Full Stack WYSIWYG Editor for Network Packets
One would think so.
I'm certainly curious how much people use the tool. Wouldn't you? However in anticipation of security concerns the software doesn't gather any info, and makes no external connections. Auto-updates were implemented, but later disabled for the same reason.
wirefloss
|
11 years ago
|
on: WireEdit – A Full Stack WYSIWYG Editor for Network Packets
You'd have to make an intelligent decision without access to full information. Isn't it often like that in life? As an engineer myself, I'd respect any decision you make.
wirefloss
|
11 years ago
|
on: WireEdit – A Full Stack WYSIWYG Editor for Network Packets
I'm afraid there is no such thing. Even open source products have critical security bugs as you may very well know.
If you do just a bit of research you can find who I am, and where I live. Code is not obfuscated. This is the best I can do.
wirefloss
|
11 years ago
|
on: WireEdit – A Full Stack WYSIWYG Editor for Network Packets
I know. Sorry. Can't fix at the moment, will do later. Try to decrease the width of the browser, the video frame will decrease proportionally. Hope that helps.
wirefloss
|
11 years ago
|
on: WireEdit – A Full Stack WYSIWYG Editor for Network Packets
Privacy policy added to the website FAQ. No data is gathered, no connections to the outside, except for a WINE repository for Ubuntu install.
wirefloss
|
11 years ago
|
on: WireEdit – A Full Stack WYSIWYG Editor for Network Packets
Yes. Will take a while.
wirefloss
|
11 years ago
|
on: WireEdit – A Full Stack WYSIWYG Editor for Network Packets
Today it's x86 only.
