xsltuser2010 | 15 years ago | on: Ask PG: Lisp vs Python (2010)
xsltuser2010's comments
xsltuser2010 | 15 years ago | on: Unofficial alternative UI of hackernews
xsltuser2010 | 15 years ago | on: Jason Fried's setup
xsltuser2010 | 15 years ago | on: Ask HN: Sorting massive text files?
The only thing is that you have to split it up and merge after sorting (for which unix sort was ok enough).
Not sure why I got that result, but even with increased buffer size for unix sort it didnt much differ. I also didn't run the splitted sorts in parallel, which would of course have been a good idea.
xsltuser2010 | 15 years ago | on: Ruby Benchmark
xsltuser2010 | 15 years ago | on: Ask HN: Review my app: Firetweets
Besides that, it really doesnt look like every other site. Almost all other sites are spoiled with eye sugar.
xsltuser2010 | 16 years ago | on: Ask HN: Is there a future in XSLT?
I wouldn't use it for a web framework, it just seems to be the wrong place. I use xslt for simple document transformation. Say you often have to deal with ridiculously complicated xml files and want to adapt them quickly and in batch to something, then using xslt is a nice way to go.
You should know functional programming to get anything more done than just throwing out some nodes, though. And the hard part about xslt ist actually xpath, which I still have problems with even after years to get the syntax right..
(I'm not a daily user, but it's my usual tool for that matter)
I haven't seen that with Python, Ruby, C++, Java, even Haskell feels 'modern' in that way. Why must it be so hard to get simple stuff going ?
(Note: I like function programming concepts, but I would expect a programming language to be easier to bind into a context of reality.)