xyziemba's comments

xyziemba | 7 years ago | on: STARTTLS Everywhere

It's worth also mentioning MTA-STS [1], currently a draft. It provides a mechanism for domains to declare a STARTTLS requirement via a file at https://<domain>/.well-known/mta-sts.txt. It's backwards compatible and opt-in. There seems to be some testing already going on [2].

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts-21

[2] https://mta-sts.gmail.com/.well-known/mta-sts.txt

xyziemba | 12 years ago | on: The .NET Native Tool-Chain

MDIL is designed to solve a different problem than LLVM IR. LLVM IR is an exchange format between a compiler frontend and backend. MDIL is designed to solve certain fragility problems in binaries.

.NET Native uses MDIL to create a looser coupling between NUTC and the runtime. This means NUTC doesn't have to understand the precise binary layout of the runtime. The binder takes care of fixing that up!

MDIL has more advanced capabilities too. For more background on MDIL, I highly recommend watching the video I linked to in the blog post: http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Going+Deep/Mani-Ramaswamy-and...

xyziemba | 12 years ago | on: The .NET Native Tool-Chain

MDIL is mostly native machine code (e.g. ARM or x64 instructions). Transforming MDIL back to source code would require significant analysis and effort. It would be more like to transforming a compiled C++ application back into C++.

Also, note that end users wouldn't be trying to transform MDIL back to source code. MDIL goes through the 'binding' step that transforms it to native machine code.