ynbl_'s comments

and mail.ru is not even a real internet service:

> Please enter the phone number you'll use to sign in to Mail instead of a password. This is more secure.

> Free 4k videos with no ads on almost any topic? Sign me up.

your username is highly relevant.

you just backed off and said that the thing i responded to is an auxiliary point then your last sentence just retakes the position you backed off from by reclaiming that the auxillery point is true

shut the fuck up. of course someone named octect is the most braindamaged fuck on earth.

> the biggest concern of the decade is that some stupid autocomplete can violate your license which never existed in the first place

this is why hapas are superior to wh*tes.

> Practically, we need ideas like to 2FA to gain tractionas widely as possible, while realising that isn't everywhere.

thats just one opinion on security. you see this world where google is an identity provider, and you prove your identity to it via a librarian or bank. i dont. an internet service should absolutely never require any form of government id nor separate network like cell.

nah i actually stated a random hazy example off the top of my head, assuming the right did it, as its the kind of shit the right tried to pull in the 90s.

what absolute outrageous absurdity as usual. america is a fucking cesspool

> In a detailed ruling, Judge Stefan Underhill concludes that the service failed to show that it doesn't circumvent YouTube's technological protection measures.

this is saudia arabia tier nonsense. why do these anti piracy articles always mention circumventing a "protection"? how can a news outlet echo this and not bat an eye? this makes me think all the people who support this law are frothing pointy haired scum that think everything should just be their way, mixed with idiots who buy into their arguments like "a protection was circumvented!". im not paying tax money to protect your absolute garbage media making $5 more from blocking piracy. you do not have the right to exist, its a privilege if anyone buys your shit (and we know well that lots of idiots are buying pop media regardless of piracy)

and what music industry? i didnt think such a thing still exists after 2010

also, youtube is unusable garbage, solely because it forces me to use their non-working in browser viewer instead of real software.

i have never had a site hacked and i dont even know or care if its being attacked - just dont litter it with rce vulns. if its being ddosed on the other hand, then use an anti ddos solution but your post is such corpo bullshit that i cant even tell if its talking about defending against ddos or defending against hacks (which you cant defend against, they will get around your filters within 5 minutes of playing around).

meh you get the point

but its not comparable to egress filtering _at all_

I saw the OP comment and assumed it was someone smugly putting aside DPRKs leaders problems and talking about his virtues.

cloudflare as of this month shows propaganda on the captcha page, like "40% of the internet was historically bots" (as if that matters). it actually fits right in with, the common sentiment that the old internet was bad, welcome in the new internet where nothing is allowed unless it's a legitimate commercial use. this is getting out of hand.

yes i didnt think theres a way to do this without hacks. unportable and fragile as expected.

nope if you use tor without tor browser you still get the captcha (one for the main domain of the site, then you have to find the cdn subdomain and open that and solve a separate captcha).

> bad traffic (about 20% of requests to my sites)

i have ran many websites too and have not needed cloudflare to deal with that "problem"

the same way it worked before cloudflare.

so people should just keep using cameras that can be trivially disabled with some off the shelf device with one button?

> Next we just need WiFi jammer alarms.

i think youve taken a wrong turn somewhere...

> Whenever I tell civilians that I’m a web designer I get the sense that they place me in that other category, that other internet I noticed as a kid. I can see it in their eyes: Ah, so you’re one of those spammers, huh?

that would be progress. right now they see the web as an "infinite source of knowledge" and proceed to google something and click an amazon link on the page purporting to have the answer.

a waf doesnt stop 99%. updating software does that. wafs are bad. stop using them.

imagine a blog with a comments section with a check box that says "bypass security check". if you click this, the admin scolds you saying "how dare you try and bypass security" and bans you. if you _dont_ click it, the admin laughs at you when you complain about too many captchas because "all you had to do was click the check box", idiot. either case can happen depending on which ideology the admin so happens to follow. thats the problem with wafs, they are ideological and opinion based but at the protocol level (but most wafs are such low quality that accidentally typing ' can get your ip banned).

yeah. paying to watch stuff on a website is a failed gimmick. i predict harsh prosecution once people realize they can get an infinitely better UX via piracy and not having companies choose what they watch and not having to do stupid stuff like web auth / web commerce

this. so much this.

its like when i tried to view a site but i was using tor and not a mainstream web browser so i had to solve 2 captchas to proceed (one for the main domain, and one for the cdn) but the captcha also takes 3 minutes to solve because its over tor and it doesnt like the speed i moved the mouse at