zaitsev1393's comments

I can understand the aspiration to have the system that can be run from the lowest level out of box tools, but then, I am doing frontend for almost a decade and this is porbably the first time I'm seeing such attention to this specific 'no js' use case, as in this thread.

Maybe I'm not reading enough webdev forums. I agree though that things that don't required js should be written in no js way.

I don't get the people who complain about the website not working with disabled js. Maybe I miss something and a large part of users disable / have js disabled in their browsers for some reason? Why the target audience of the ruby, probably primary web developers, whould do that? Or is this a some kind of secret handshake so community accept you (to build a website that can work with no js)?

No idea why i can't access this website from Ukraine.

Location: Kyiv, Ukraine Remote: Yes Willing to relocate: No Technologies: JS, TS, CSS, HTML, Ionic, but mostly Angular 2+ and everything about it; can pick up any frontend / backend technology as they all js anyway and i rely on foundamental skills. Resume/CV: https://www.linkedin.com/in/glib-zaycev-89096a10a/ Email: [email protected]

Extra: 6yoe, 2 long term projects, (AngularJS + Rails -> Angular 2+ + Ionic), want to transition to React (preferably MERN). Shoot me a mail or message on Linkedin, I am finishing my job at startup and looking for new challenges.