zyroth | 18 years ago | on: Production Languages and Toy Languages
zyroth's comments
zyroth | 18 years ago | on: Steve Jobs keynote speech leaked?
zyroth | 18 years ago | on: Converting Pi to binary: Don't do it!
zyroth | 18 years ago | on: Here's the basic problem: you're writing a text editor. Stop doing that. It's 2007.
zyroth | 18 years ago | on: Converting Pi to binary: Don't do it!
Actually, there is no proof and no counter proof that every finite string comes up in pi. (...that I know of)
zyroth | 18 years ago | on: Converting Pi to binary: Don't do it!
How sure are you with that one? Mind to supply a proof?
zyroth | 18 years ago | on: Converting Pi to binary: Don't do it!
01001000100001...
Guess what? There are uncountable ones.
zyroth | 18 years ago | on: Converting Pi to binary: Don't do it!
zyroth | 18 years ago | on: The Next Generation of Neural Networks [Google Tech Talk]
zyroth | 18 years ago | on: Mac OS X Leopard: 200+ Productivity Booster Keyboard Shortcuts
Productivity Booster, right.
zyroth | 18 years ago | on: Ask YC: What new technologies are you exploring?
zyroth | 18 years ago | on: Ideas to monetize new artifical intelligence
It is not like "here is one transaction, is it a fraud?" but "here are 2^20 transactions, what are the frauds?".
You could do this by pipelining, but I guess Banks want a zero downtime system and I personally would not trust an API in terms of reliability.
Another point is, that banks will not give you the original data. They will have to "pseudonymize" several entries, such as credit card numbers, names, ... This would force them to preprocess the data which gives every transaction a very little + O(n) and which might decrease the speed even more.
(I'm not saying it's technically impossible, but I'd say there are better ways, such as releasing it closed source or just using it to predict financial data - which as we all know is possible and being done by hedge fonds, so this should be the best way IF you have that algorithm ;)
zyroth | 18 years ago | on: Ideas to monetize new artifical intelligence
zyroth | 18 years ago | on: Ideas to monetize new artifical intelligence
Oh yes, they do. That I do know.
zyroth | 18 years ago | on: Ideas to monetize new artifical intelligence
zyroth | 18 years ago | on: Ideas to monetize new artifical intelligence
zyroth | 18 years ago | on: Norvig - new world's longest palindrome
zyroth | 18 years ago | on: How to teach a Bayesian spam filter to play chess
zyroth | 18 years ago | on: How to teach a Bayesian spam filter to play chess
zyroth | 18 years ago | on: How to teach a Bayesian spam filter to play chess
See, a bayesian cannot really understand that there are relations between two numbers (like "is bigger than" or "is the following number of"), but a neural network can, since addition is part of a NN.
My personal recommendation on machine learning is 'Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning' by Chris Bishop. But you definately do need a solid mathematical background for that.
I think you get used to every Syntax. The point is, Lisp et al are much more compact, which makes the concepts easier to grasp.
I get a (mapcar #'f '(1 2 3)) much quicker than a
x = {1, 2, 3}; for (int i = 1; i < 4; i++) { x[i] *= 2; }