I'm the Director of Hardware at Y Combinator, and we have awesome companies in our current batch running crowdfunding campaigns. Ask their founders anything!
Participating will be the founders of Tovala, Soundboks, Enflux, and Hykso.
Also joining me will be Philip Winter, CEO of Nebia, from our most recent batch.
[+] [-] louprado|10 years ago|reply
I have no problem following regulations and paying for licenses. The problem is getting blind-sided by it. I still don't even understand if I need a RoHS certification to ship in my home state of California. Is there any resource you found helpful ? Thanks in advance.
[+] [-] JonFish85|10 years ago|reply
At least in my own work this has been something that pops up time & time again. Not only are there regulations that are tricky to nail down, there are things like intellectual property that you may not even be aware you're using. Build a blinking LED to detect activity on a data line? Wouldn't be surprised to receive a letter from a law firm. And unfortunately I don't know of any great ways to avoid the nasty surprise of receiving patent-backed threats. Personally I think this is why the big companies bulk up on patents, so that they can at least promise Mutually Assured Destruction against each other. For smaller companies & people selling products, you're probably infringing on some patent that they own without even realizing it.
[+] [-] Undertow10|10 years ago|reply
"BLUETOOTH TRADEMARK LICENSE AGREEMENT
This Bluetooth Trademark License Agreement (the “License”) is made as of the date of acceptance by you as a member of Bluetooth SIG, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Bluetooth SIG”), as evidenced by you entering into the Bluetooth SIG Membership Agreement by clicking the “I Accept” button at the bottom of the Bluetooth SIG Membership Application and Commitment Agreement.
Effective upon such date, Bluetooth SIG, having ownership of the Bluetooth Trademarks (as defined below) hereby grants you the following rights related to such Bluetooth Trademarks in consideration for your acceptance of the terms and conditions of the Bluetooth SIG Membership Agreement."
....
"2 LICENSE GRANT. 2.1 Scope. Subject to the Member complying with the terms and conditions of the Membership Agreement, this License and the Instructions, Bluetooth SIG hereby grants Member a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive, nontransferable (with no right to sublicense), personal right to use the Bluetooth Trademark(s) in relation to production, manufacture, supply, promotion, marketing, sale, lease or other distribution and advertisement of Bluetooth Services and/or Bluetooth Products that include Compliant Portions (the “Trademark License”)."
[+] [-] dalanmiller|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Undertow10|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] joshavant|10 years ago|reply
I graduated from a moderately-ranked undergrad program with a 3.0 in Computer Engineering (the HW-centric flavor of CS), going on 6 years ago.
After graduation, I wanted to get into the embedded field, but was discouraged by the employment options (hardware hadn't yet made the comeback it has been making over the last 3-5 years... 'old' players like Intel still dominated, which wasn't particularly attractive to a bright-eyed 21 year old).
In the interim 6 years, I've been doing iOS development, and believe I've amassed a CV that speaks well to my dedication and work ethic (and is moderately accomplished, at that!).
My question is... how far off am I from being a viable candidate for embedded job opportunities? What kinds of projects/side-work would you like to see to prove that I 'still have it' and/or could sufficiently think on my feet, and get back into embedded development?
FWIW, I have resume experience at Apple, Microsoft, and Google (I actually was hired at Apple out of college to do hardware QA but, once I realized the path from QA to embedded development would be a near impossible feat, I quickly moved on to iOS development).
Thanks! And good luck with your respective products!!
[+] [-] liseman|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Hykso|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] FUSAR_rs|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|10 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] thebiglebrewski|10 years ago|reply
Mostly I feel like a software guy that's a bit of a hardware wannabe and it feels like I'd never get to the point where I could build a legit product, and would love some guidance on how to ideate in this space.
[+] [-] spacebug|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] zeeshanm|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] liseman|10 years ago|reply
You're in luck: prototyping is mostly software:)
[+] [-] Hykso|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|10 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] franciscop|10 years ago|reply
Would you consider sponsoring our community or the contest? We are operating with a budget under 1000$. Both money and products would be awesome :D
[1] https://2014.spaceappschallenge.org/awards/#globalwin Next Vision (Space Helmet)
[2] http://hyperloopupv.com/
[3] http://makersupv.com/
[4] http://orchallenge.es/
[+] [-] spacebug|10 years ago|reply
This way you are not selling the product you shipped them, so I'm not sure what are regulations regarding this strategy. The product would be clearly labeled as prototype version and not fit for end use.
Bonus points for complexity: The product is intended for children age 6+.
[+] [-] grape_|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jonesb6|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gourneau|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ogreveins|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pwinter28|10 years ago|reply
I would focus less on being replicated, and focus more on handling your own issues. Another way to think about it is if you get to the point where you product is good enough and with enough attention that it gets copied in a serious way, you've clearly achieved something.
Cover your bases with IP and be smart, but just focus on getting the best product to market fastest and delivering a great customer experience.
[+] [-] drabie|10 years ago|reply
Further, if you start to think about your hardware as a means of delivering something else (for us, that's food), then getting copycatted on the hardware won't be as hard to deal with from a business standpoint.
[+] [-] thirru|10 years ago|reply
Did any of you attempt any influencer marketing? (celebrities or connectors on Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, Snapchat)
If so, how well did it work and did you pay them (if so what was the model, commission, or up-front payment). Would you do it again?
[+] [-] Hykso|10 years ago|reply
We actually went through some influencers on our side (known fighters or coaches).
It definitely helped gain a lot of credibility on our end because if it was that much of a revolutionary product, why would pro athletes not use it amd endorse it. so for us it helped a lot convince our customers that it was a legit product.
However, we have been offered to post on a few famous people pages for 5k but we didn't do it as we thought it would actually be seen as paid advertising instead of genuine and authentic love for the product. We're still exploring those avenues though.
[+] [-] drabie|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rdl|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] compumike|10 years ago|reply
We (Pantelligent, YC W13) did a Kickstarter, then successfully shipped to customers, and are now transitioning to normal orders. Our actual production costs and timeline were within ~15% of our before-the-fact spreadsheet estimates, but then again, we were experienced engineers who know how to ship hardware & software products, which is quite unlike most new entrants.
Just within the "temperature controlled cooking products" space, I could name a bunch of "competitors," but not a single one besides ourselves has shipped, with the exception of the existing sous-vide field which has had more time to develop and is fairly simple from an engineering perspective. Most of these products will likely never ship.
Sadly, crowdfunding usually leads to dramatic overpromising on features (some of which are not even manufacturable!), and severe and unsustainable underpricing, in order to drive pre-orders. That's just a recipe for disappointed customers and dead companies.
[+] [-] dfox|10 years ago|reply
And another question for the business side of things: where is the line for consumer products that are not meaningful to crowdfund? niche-ness? complexity of installation? does it make sense to crowdfund what is essentially an B2B product?
[+] [-] wilcoxbr|10 years ago|reply
Early prototypes use whatever we have laying around to get the most fundamental feature of the idea vetted.
Right before production, you will build a prototype that we call a First Article. This is a Golden Sample, and every production unit should be just like the First Article.
Prototypes in between those two are built to answer specific questions and we spend no extra resources on sourcing special components that do not directly impact accurate answering of the question.
For things like displays, wireless modules, etc. we work with the manufacturer's Field Application Engineers. They can get you insight on what will be available for production, documentation for the components, etc. They can also probably get you samples for your development work.
McMaster-Carr, DigiKey, Mouser, AdaFruit, SparkFun, etc. are your friends for making those early prototypes.
Crowdfunding is essentially pre-ordering on a social platform. If your market is there and interested, crowdfunding can be a viable market validation step for any business model.
[+] [-] cbw5|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pwinter28|10 years ago|reply
Further to that we have plans for making the Nebia experience more customizable. And so in future versions there will be features that allow you to make the experience even more personal, and these will allow for repeated brand interactions with the customer.
[+] [-] anujdeshpande|10 years ago|reply
- Getting early prototypes out there has kind of been decremental for us. Even the smaller bizs are willing to pay higher for a more "field-tested" device. Which seems like a recursive problem ;). Should one spend more time on getting v1.0 done ? - Is there anyone who you'd recommend to handle global shipping and taxes? The way that Pebble had tied up with distributors in different places depending on your country, etc.
(We are building talking posters. One's with BLE play prerecorded messages, and you can interact with them, and the one's with WiFi are connected to the Internet and are more interactive.)
Thanks !
[+] [-] erohead|10 years ago|reply
- I'd recommend sticking to a local fulfillment service that has great customer support for your early shipments. There is absolutely no need to optimize for cost in the early days. Just make sure you have someone you can call to sort out shipment delays, lost packages, etc. You can always expand to more fulfillment centres later.
Sounds like a cool idea! Are the posters epaper or static?
[+] [-] martinushk|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dalanmiller|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cfederico|10 years ago|reply
- What is the best way to get traction on the product before launching the campaign?
- How much money you need to set up a good marketing Kickstarter campaign ? Is it needed to use a good PR agency ? (Any suggestions about a good PR agency ? )
Thank you so much!
Federico
[+] [-] liseman|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Hykso|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jmcmahon443|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] liseman|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] thirru|10 years ago|reply
How happy were you with the experience so far? There are a few up and downsides as drabie had mentioned before.
Taking all of that into account, would you use Kickstarter again if you had the choice again?
[+] [-] pwinter28|10 years ago|reply
I think each company is different though, and you have to consider your strengths, as in do you have a strong online acquisition strategy/team, in which case a campaign on your own site may make more sense.
Now that our campaign is over we use Celery for pre-orders on nebia.com
[+] [-] elijahparker|10 years ago|reply
Seems like an enticing option, my main concern is how much of the Kickstarter market might I miss?
Are people who buy on Kickstarter a subset of those who buy a finished product, or is it an entirely separate group?
I can see pros and cons of both ways, and I know a lot has to do with my specific market (niche time-lapse), but would love to hear any comments or insight. Thanks!
[+] [-] mrshuptrine|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pwinter28|10 years ago|reply
As for marketing value of "American Made" I think it can be very helpful, but you have to make that a part of your brand. Otherwise it won't make much of a difference.
[+] [-] gabsong|10 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pwinter28|10 years ago|reply
Here is a direct quote from the guy who set up and manages our customer service system "be meticulous but also efficient".
The best platform we've used is "Front" also a YC company. Clean and super fast interface.