The front page is mostly made up of stories with a lot of votes. Stories with fewer votes bubble up briefly and then sink down again. Could HN be missing out on interesting stories that are not interesting to everybody? Is there a way to see stories that do respectably well -- say get > 10 points -- even if they don't reach 194?
[+] [-] pg|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] abstractbill|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] thinkbohemian|16 years ago|reply
Pros: More content on front page.
Cons: Slightly inconsistent content on front page between users, would need to be able to easily toggle between modes, incase you wanted to show a friend something.
What are your thoughts?
[+] [-] tome|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] oscardelben|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nirav|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lsc|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Kilimanjaro|16 years ago|reply
- Voting for STORIES is retarded. It can be EASILY gamed.
- There should be editors who pick news RELATED to the main purpose of the site.
- Let the people SUBMIT stories but let the editors PICK the most relevant.
- On the other hand, voting in COMMENTS is ok.
A good idea would be to have say ten editors and let them vote on stories submitted by users. Stories with 5 votes or more go to the front page.
Can it be gamed? Sure!
When that happens it's time to change editors.
[+] [-] pbiggar|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jonah|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dmharrison|16 years ago|reply
But the primary reason I use the feed is that it's filtered high quality new material that I'm genuinely not likely to have seen before.
[+] [-] gaulinmp|16 years ago|reply
[+] [-] devinj|16 years ago|reply