Ask HN: What's stopping you from using Firefox as your primary browser?
For me it's a simple feature in Chrome "tab to search" which frustratingly has never been ported into Firefox and every time I try to switch over the absense of this feature lures me back to Chrome as I'm just more effective with it.
Ref: http://www.danielfuterman.com/google-chrome-tab-to-search
What stopping you?
[edit: grammar fixes]
[+] [-] cygned|9 years ago|reply
I actually love Firefox' dev tools and I really would like to use it - and it's not a bad browser at all- but as a developer all the small things add up (same reason why I cannot use Safari as my daily browser).
[+] [-] mythmon_|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] no_protocol|9 years ago|reply
For example, a bookmark to search Amazon:
So now if I enter the following in my address bar: I am brought to an Amazon search results page for keyboards.I don't like the tab-to-search version in Chrome very much by comparison. There is a service called Shortmarks that aims to emulate this behavior in Chrome, but I'm not sure how I feel about using it.
---
I switched to Chrome about 5 years ago because Firefox was getting slow for me. Recently I am strongly considering switching back. My biggest continual annoyance with Chrome is poor searching of previous visited pages when typing partial URLs into the address bar. The main thing holding me back right now is I am wondering how this will impact me when using a Chromebook.
[+] [-] richardboegli|9 years ago|reply
!a keyboard
If you need to search Google
!g keyboard
Cannot recall how long I've been using it, but it replaced the need for me to have bookmark searches.
[+] [-] scandox|9 years ago|reply
Update: I'm back in Firefox. Already been nagged twice by Google to use Chrome.
[+] [-] kevlar1818|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] uncletaco|9 years ago|reply
2. Now its security issues. I'm watching closely however to see how firefox evolves over the next year.
[+] [-] VLM|9 years ago|reply
In the mega-corporate IT world you have supported locked down apps and best effort apps (and banned apps but thats not relevant to this discussion)
Officially FF is locked down to hell and back and I can't customize it in any way or install ad blockers or web development tools in any way. HOWEVER being locked down the IT support personnel can officially walk users thru using the corporate intranet or the medical insurance site or whatever without any weird "peoplesoft doesn't work, I didn't think it important to mention I installed an adblocker or javascript blocker and fifteen toolbars and ...". Support isn't happening without it being locked down to the point of uselessness.
Meanwhile chrome is on the tolerated but not locked down list and I can install ad blockers and development tools all I want but if it doesn't work then IT support has a written policy to not give a F. They're not actively blocking it, deleting it, or locking it down, but they are not actively supporting it at all. If some obscure IT supported something-as-a-service doesn't work with Chrome, they autoclose the ticket officially. Unofficially they're not total jerks, of course, so they'd fix it, just officially Chrome doesn't exist.
So take a wild guess which one I use at work... I can't imagine using the internet without an adblocker, can't install one, or anything, on FF, so ...
[+] [-] chrisvalleybay|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gtf21|9 years ago|reply
1) tab-to-search (you mention already) 2) Chrome is "cleaner" out of the box (I'm sure I can have an omnibox in Fx I just haven't tried very hard) 3) I prefer Chrome's developer tools by a huge margin (especially the react/redux ones) 4) easy profile switching in Chrome (I have a dev profile that I use a lot) 5) Chrome better history plugin
[+] [-] williamstein|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gnicholas|9 years ago|reply
I have been drifting away, however, because it seems to get very slow. This is partly because of the number of tabs I keep open (thanks to TST, which makes it easy), but that's not the only culprit. Even after re-starting it, when most tabs are not loaded, it gets slow pretty fast. JS also runs much faster in Chrome, I've discovered.
[+] [-] hs86|9 years ago|reply
It is a separate window with a tab tree for my entire browser session (= all windows), has a much better keyboard support, supports the unloading of any subtree (makes The Great Suspender obsolete) and you can sync your (sub)tree from an other computer to the current computer's session just via drag and drop.
In the linked screenshot [2] you can see my current session with collapsed subtrees and the grey captioned subtree isn't even loaded. With (shift+)tab I can (un)intend tabs to make them into childs or siblings and with ctrl+up/down I can reorder them. This can be also done with the mouse and compared to TST it actually feels deterministic.
Going back to Firefox with TST would be a downgrade. :(
[1] https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/tabs-outliner/eggk...
[2] http://imgur.com/a/1HZSi
[+] [-] richardboegli|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] schoen|9 years ago|reply
Edit: another advantage of Chromium is that Google has put so many resources into securing it; reportedly as a direct result of this, vulnerabilities in Firefox are easier to find (and cheaper in vulnerability markets).
[+] [-] azdle|9 years ago|reply
Not sure if that will actually help you though, lots of sites are using user agent sniffing to only allow chrome instead of detecting it properly.
[+] [-] comex|9 years ago|reply
2. Lack of interest in macOS. I still remember when I got the first Mac with a Retina Display, shortly after release, and most third-party apps were pixelated and looked like crap. Among browsers, the timeline looked like this:
June 11, 2012: Hardware announced and released; Safari HiDPI support
July 31, 2012: Chrome HiDPI support (50 days after release)
January 8, 2013: Firefox HiDPI support (211 days after release)
Safari obviously had the advantage of prior knowledge, but that doesn't excuse Firefox taking so much longer than Chrome.
Maybe they've improved things since then, but... considering that they still don't support the pinch-to-zoom trackpad gesture, I'm not optimistic.
3. Security. Firefox has been the only browser to not feature sandboxing for quite a few years. Now that Electrolysis has been revived, this should be fixed eventually.
[+] [-] sssilver|9 years ago|reply
Comparing to Chrome's current beta, with about 15 installed/active addons including uBlock Origin.
Firefox has Gmail + https://www.nytimes.com/
Chrome has Gmail + 2 windows, each with 30+ tabs + https://www.nytimes.com/
Pressing <Space> in Chrome to page down in https://www.nytimes.com/ -- completely smooth pagedown
Same in Firefox -- significant lag, jitter, tearing. Pressing <Space> the second time -- don't even see animation, just see the page offset jump.
I'm on Sierra 10.12.2 (16C67)
This is what's stopping me.
[+] [-] rc_bhg|9 years ago|reply
I've installed "Chrome Store Foxified" and it's hit or miss on if a given Chrome Plugin will actually work in FF.
[+] [-] jacek|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] vanous|9 years ago|reply
Enable e10s
MOZ_USE_XINPUT2=1 firefox
dom.w3c_touch_events.enabled
[+] [-] mythmon_|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] flavoie|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tombrossman|9 years ago|reply
Is Chrome really any safer than Firefox when Firefox is used with the "holy trinity" of uBlock Origin, Privacy Badger, and NoScript? I realize that comparing a default Chrome install to Firefox with these three extensions might be perceived as an unfair comparison, but this configuration with FF is my daily driver for a long time now and I would like to know if there are any real benefits to returning to a browser from an ad company.
Privacy and security are both important to me, with privacy slightly more so. If I suffer a security breach, I wipe, restore from backups, and continue. Not so for a privacy breach.
[+] [-] signal11|9 years ago|reply
Firefox has a similar feature called 'Quick Searches' (look in Firefox's Bookmarks menu). For example, I have one for Flickr - keyword 'fl', url 'https://www.flickr.com/search/?q=%s&w=all'.
So if I type 'fl bridges' in the address bar I go to https://www.flickr.com/search/?q=bridges&w=all
[+] [-] paule89|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] webwanderings|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] qhoc|9 years ago|reply
1. Firefox crashes would take down the entire browser, not just specific tab
2. I often load a lot of tweets in Twitter.com tab (back 4 hours). This causes Firefox to freeze.
3. If I refresh the slow tab, I watch memory not being clean and still stay there for several minutes. Chrome clears memory very quickly.
4. Why is the space around address bar so large? They are like 15 px top and bottom. What a waste.
5. Postman is only Chrome
6. Chrome Dev Tools is 10x better
I have no complain about CSS rendering issues or anything like that. It's mainly just performance. Also I tend to use Firefox in the firewall because the Proxy feature works quite well to connect to my internal lab.
[+] [-] AstralStorm|9 years ago|reply
2. 3. Yes, memory leaks still exist.
4. To prevent GUI overlap attacks and fake popups.
5. I bet there is an equivalent.
6. Very much no, though they are faster for sure.
[+] [-] hasanen|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] saberworks|9 years ago|reply
[+] [-] doggydog123|9 years ago|reply
but getting these negatives: 1. super huge memory use and dozens of processes, easy to completely fill memory of a super workstation 2. every keypress and webpage action recorded by big firm 3. lack of plugins in mobile version 4. hated and blocked by companies