My startup company, located in a major city, is going remote-only. Meaning, we are currently in a shared office space, but some time in the coming months, we will no longer have that space and will be a remote-only org. A variety of reasons were given for this decision, including the fact that we already have a bunch of remote workers. Has your startup successfully transitioned to be remote-only or is this a flag I should start looking for other jobs?
[+] [-] muzani|7 years ago|reply
If you go partially remote, communication tools are disjointed; you'll have meetings with some, lunch with some, Skype with some. Skype as a core communication tool is a red flag.
But if everyone is full remote, you start to adopt more effective communication methods. Instead of status update meetings, people stay up on Slack 24/7, shitpost constantly, which also includes regular status update. You'll start adopting project management tools as a way to maintain project updates. Little private channels form up where people can vent disagreements or flag problems with the rest of the team.
If the team is only partially remote, this doesn't happen. Problems fester, tools like Slack or Trello fall apart because they're unused by upper management or the people doing the work. And these tools will be unused when there are "better" tools like face to face meetings.
I actually get a lot more honesty from remote teams because the can speak up on issues which they wouldn't face to face. Regular shitposting on Slack also breaks the ice better than doing team building outings.
[+] [-] chatmasta|7 years ago|reply
If not, that’s a red flag IMO. Small startups have no excuse not to keep their employees informed on this topic. If the company is in dire straits, employees deserve to know. Similarly if the company is doing well, employees deserve to know.
Of course executives will balance that obligation with the need to keep morale. If the company is in trouble, but it’s not catastrophic yet, I could see why they might choose to keep that information from employees. The last thing they want at a critical make-or-break juncture like that is a stampede out the door or a bunch of engineers interviewing for new jobs.
If you have a good relationship with your manager (or the CEO in the case of a small startup), I would recommend discussing your concerns with him/her. If you do not have such a relationship, well... that’s a red flag.
[+] [-] eurticket|7 years ago|reply
Follow your feeling on this as you are closer to the details, and set up a contingency plan and in the meantime enjoy the lifestyle remote work could bring you.
[+] [-] jeffnappi|7 years ago|reply
If you're concerned about anything I recommend you ask your manager and/or the CEO directly.
[+] [-] rajacombinator|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] shoo|7 years ago|reply
remote-only could be great. https://www.remoteonly.org/
[+] [-] mottomotto|7 years ago|reply
Are there pain points? Yes, communication can be difficult and the transition can be difficult for managers. People seem to really vary in their ability to comprehend how async communication can work (as in, what needs to be a group announcement on a call versus just an update in Slack or email).
So I personally wouldn't see the change as a red flag. Having had my current experience, I would be delighted and would be considering where to move to maximize taking advantage of being remote. But it really is a "your experience may vary" based on what you're looking for.
[+] [-] nottorp|7 years ago|reply
Unfortunately I forgot the name, but maybe some other HNer remembers.
This doesn't answer your question, but it's a data point that it has happened before. Unless you work for them :)
[+] [-] sorich87|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tedmiston|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bowlich|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] segmondy|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] viabary|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] itronitron|7 years ago|reply