Ask HN: How do you become the best at something?
25 points| hsikka | 7 years ago
Through it all, I’ve found a love for ml, and I’d like to spend the next 4-6 months diving deep, validating some hypotheses, and becoming a capable researcher/ml engineer. But my insecurities force me to constantly try and productize my learning, and I constantly get distracted thinking about how folks are building incredible companies and I’m losing time to make an impact. I'm all fluff, no depth.
How do I gain mastery?
[+] [-] nodelessness|7 years ago|reply
I see your motivation is seeing your peers "get ahead" of you. We all do through that. I've gone through that. I chased after something because I wanted to keep up with my friends. It made me miserable. It's years long misery to achieve something that is unhealthy and not what I decided what I wanted for me.
I'd avoid being allowing others progress and achievements place pressure on you.
[+] [-] matt_the_bass|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] craftyguy|7 years ago|reply
0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keeping_up_with_the_Joneses
[+] [-] godot|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] buffaloo|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] auslegung|7 years ago|reply
To address the OP's question, you stay focused on X for a while and one day you will wake up to discover you think of X as an old, faithful friend. Stay focused on X for long enough and it will become like another appendage. Stay focused even longer and X will become like your skin.
[+] [-] Leftium|7 years ago|reply
> Recapping my skill set: I have poor art skills, mediocre business skills, good but not great writing talent, and an early knowledge of the Internet. And I have a good but not great sense of humor. I’m like one big mediocre soup. None of my skills are world-class, but when my mediocre skills are combined, they become a powerful market force.
More info here (and in Scott Adams' book): [1]
It's like Google AdWords: very difficult to rank highly for one keyword, but possible for a set of three or more related keywords.
Adams alludes to the fact you don't have to be the best to succeed; there are alternate roads to success. Another take on this is "relative expertise." You don't have to be the foremost expert on a subject before you can help others; you just need to know more than the person you're helping.
[1]: http://sourcesofinsight.com/scott-adams-success-formula/
[+] [-] swatcoder|7 years ago|reply
Or, you know, reflect on why being exceptional is so important to you. Maybe it doesn’t need to be.
[+] [-] robotsonic|7 years ago|reply
Being top-percentile in communication is nothing to brush off. It's about finding where to use your top-percentile skills that can be the challenge.
I could be in the top 1% of people who grow green tomatoes, but if I'm not using that skill for something, does it matter? Maybe skill-for-the-sake-of-skill does matter on some level, but maybe I should find a way to use my mastery for something.
[+] [-] philcockfield|7 years ago|reply
I wouldn't frame the impulse to "productize" something necessarily as buckling to an insecurity.
Deep learning (no pun) is so often the result of recontextualising what you've studied into some new form of your own making. If that's a "product" of sorts, then all the better for advancing your other goal of "building an incredible company."
[+] [-] stephen82|7 years ago|reply
Both of us lack of specialization and this is due to lots of factors I'm afraid.
Feel free to read my own issue: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18136580
[+] [-] RickJWagner|7 years ago|reply
I think to do that, you have to be born with an extra shot of natural talent. I'm very good at some things, but there is always somebody that's better.
As to getting very good at something-- I think study and hard work are the keys.
[+] [-] anothergoogler|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jorgemf|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] oceanghost|7 years ago|reply
Perhaps this would lead you to the conclusion that you should be a generalist, but nobody hires generalists, I speak from personal experience.
[+] [-] jvreagan|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pongogogo|7 years ago|reply