I've been asked if I would join a startup with as a non-founding, but critical hire. I've been offered a great amount of equity according to my research. I like the company a lot and think they're on to something. I can figure out most of the pros and cons of joining them, but don't have a sense of what it could be like assuming a really positive outcome. For those who ended up at really successful companies as non-founders, was it worth it? Were you happy with your equity when the company sold or had an IPO? Did the final outcome fall short of your expectations in any way?Though the details are sparse, I used a throwaway to not upset the founders.
[+] [-] manpreets7|15 years ago|reply
So, if you are not starting your company and if you believe in what the founders are doing, I would say go for it.
[+] [-] wdgtmkr|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] throwaway2342|15 years ago|reply
Joined post-series-A at 0.2%. These initial options eventually got diluted down to 0.05%. I did get "re-upped" with more options over the years, so when the company exited seven years later, my total was about 0.085%.
I ended up with an extra $227K for my efforts. This was on top of an above-market salary. Not too bad, but did fall short of my expectations.
[+] [-] brudgers|15 years ago|reply
http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2010/10/employee-equity-dilution.htm...
Good Luck.
[+] [-] lowkey|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] wdgtmkr|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mattm|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] stiggz|15 years ago|reply
[deleted]