Ask HN: Help, Investor wants money back in 7 days "Or else"
So here we are 8 weeks after the deal, and things could not have gone worse. From day 1 the employee made it clear they did not intend to do sales, but instead had a "vision" for the company and wanted to run it. They first tried to buy out the CEO and president to do so, but we refused. After that they refused to work the sales plan we had developed, refused to be accountable to any touches/sales goals, hired staff without budget approval, purchased equipment/services without approval (sometimes express disapproval), took 20% vacation days, worked 10-4, and walked out of 3 meetings. The person basically would take no direction or training from the CEO (their agreed upon boss) and eventually moved out of the office to setup an office in another location. When called out on this behavior the person threatened to suit for all sorts of things, hostile work environment being #1 - they also threatened to pull their investment 3 times, including 3 working days in!
So here we are now, we have made it very clear that the employment will not continue like this, and have started the process of removing the job with cause. Seeing that coming they have requested to reverse the deal and demand we return the full investment in 1 week, or they can "do it the hard way". They would like to reverse everything so that it is like it never happened. There is nothing in our agreement that covers this, besides them selling their shares, the employment is not guaranteed on paper. We too would like them out of the company for obvious reasons but there are issues with this demand:
1. 7 days it a short amount of time to come up with 400k 2. a lot of the investment has been committed (in good faith) to salaries and equipment, included the salary paid to the investor for "working" in the sales role (which yielded 0 sales, 1 presentation, and 0 estimates) 3. Some of the investment bought personal stock from one of the owners. So that money is taxed, been used to delete debt, and not in the company. 4. They know all our IP from having access to literally everything from basecamp to 3yrs of client sales data, our staff and to how we do what we do. They have made it very clear they want to turn around and open a directly competing company as soon as they leave.
Anytime we push back on these issues they again threaten to suit, and they remind us they have a huge pile of cash for that and we don't.
We have offered to buy back 185K of their stock immediately, and the rest by the end of the year from accounts receivable. We think this would be more realistic, doing the buy back much faster would starve the company of cash, and very well put us negative on cash-flow. We are also asking that the existing non-compete, non-disparagement, and NDA they signed still stand. I also feel like the 30K spent on their salaries should be deducted from the buyback.
Of course we think this is all total BS, and the "right" thing to do is to suit them, but that is not our DNA, and would jeopardize the company we have now (growing revenues at 125% a year for the past 3 years).
I know what we did wrong, trust me, but what do you think we should do now to finish this?
[+] [-] pg|15 years ago|reply
You probably don't need to worry about the guy starting a competing company. If he does it will fail.
[+] [-] dirkstoop|15 years ago|reply
Also remember that there's a lot a lawyer can do for you in a situation like this, way before a lawsuit is even on the horizon.
[+] [-] lsc|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|15 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] drats|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Multiplayer|15 years ago|reply
There are a number of dynamics at play in a situation like this and it can get very confusing, very quickly. The new guy is both an investor whose money they are currently spending and also an employee which blurs the lines on how to manage a relationship like this.
I have seen these kinds of relationships blow up before and when you are a young and inexperienced entrepreneur you don't know whether to engage him, disengage and get attorneys involved or just go crazy. Sometimes it looks like the other guy is holding all the cards.
This doesn't scream clueless, it screams confused and not sure whether to spend scarce resources on attorneys. Next time they will have an attorney standing by.
[+] [-] ankeshk|15 years ago|reply
1. Hire a good lawyer and get good advice. The best defense is a good offense and all that.
Make sure he has no ability to use company funds. Cancel his company debit / credit card if he received one as a director of sales. Send an official letter by registered post letting him know that he does not have the ability to authorize expenses above $100 or so.
Then follow your lawyer's advice on firing him from the sales position.
Make sure your lawyer communicates the non-compete part with him properly - so that he realizes that if he leaves now, he won't be able to profit from the idea at all - and its better to stay with you and earn 22% of the pie than go for 100% and get a big fight on his hands that he will most likely lose.
2. > The person had a large rolodex in a segment of our market.
This tells us that the person's reputation can be adversely affected. Threat of bad press could maybe get him in line.
Also, it would be a good idea to find at least one or two common connections and try making them mediators.
3. This is the stick. You need to offer him a carrot too.
Make him an offer: he does not work with you. He retains his shares and plays a role as an investor. He gives up the board seat - and remains a silent investor. He gives you a connection / letter of referral for all the contacts he is sitting on - for a flat fee. No vesting of shares.
Position this "getting a fee for writing a letter of introduction to his connections" - as the carrot. A lot depends on how you phrase it.
4. Start contacting other investors who could maybe buy this person's share out. I doubt if you can find and close someone in 7 days, but the sooner you start looking, the better.
[+] [-] okmjuhb|15 years ago|reply
Under no circumstances should you make threats like this without talking to a lawyer.
[+] [-] ultrasaurus|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cperciva|15 years ago|reply
Sometimes threats are just threats. When I was starting Tarsnap, I spoke to an "angel" investor who, when it became clear that we wouldn't reach a deal, threatened to sue me to recover his "expenses" associated with considering an investment. A few months ago I got an email from an "inventor" threatening to sue me for infringing on his patent application.
In both cases, I responded that I thought they'd be laughed out of court; and I haven't heard from either since.
[+] [-] cletus|15 years ago|reply
The first thing a lawyer will probably tell you is say nothing.
[+] [-] dotBen|15 years ago|reply
HN'ers all mean well, but few-to-none of us are lawyers. I've seen examples where many well-meaning geeks (I'm one too) have up-voted an answer to a legal question that is actually incorrect or not the best course of action.
Always take legal advice from a lawyer over the advice of 100 geeks. If the amount of money we're talking about here is $400k then you must have had a lawyer involved to do the deal so go back to them seeing as they are familiar (and should have put provisions in for this kind of outcome).
[+] [-] prawn|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ScottBurson|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] JeffL|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mattmaroon|15 years ago|reply
Do yourself a favor and ignore every piece of advice that isn't "talk to a good lawyer". Except the piece of advice that says you should ignore every piece of advice and talk to a lawyer. Or that second one.
Now my head hurts. What should I do?
[+] [-] ivankirigin|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] metamemetics|15 years ago|reply
Also, humor is life's great defuser. If you can figure out how to make him laugh at least a couple times in the next few weeks, it will be a surprisingly huge aid.
[ Even though this is at the unavoidably SERIOUS BUSINESS aka lawyer point, you need to get meta, make light of the situation, don't jump through the hoops he creates for you. His train of thought is carrying you and your business and it's headed to bye-bye camp. DERAIL this train in anyway possible, even if it involves providing framed motivational posters of LOLcats for his new office. Also, consider getting him drunk at some point if possible. ]
[+] [-] alexro|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Br1c3|15 years ago|reply
Like others have said you need to get a lawyer pronto.
Direct all communication through you new lawyer, or with your lawyer present.
Some things to discuss with your lawyer:
1.Nature of the investment?
2.What terms did you and the investor agree to in writing?
3.Termination of employment, don’t just fire him w/o talking with your lawyer.
4.His unauthorized hires, purchases.
[+] [-] anigbrowl|15 years ago|reply
It can't be a cash question, you could get an hour of excellent legal advice for $1000 even in a big city.
Also (and this applies to all legal 411 queries on HN), where is the firm incorporated/located? Rules vary across different US states, and there are lots of HN folk who are not in the USA at all. I'm only guessing you're American when I mention 4 numbers, for all I know you could be in Uzbekistan. Even if I was a lawyer, how would I know which rules govern your case, or whether I was close enough to offer assistance?
And why don't you have a throwaway email address in case someone can give you an exact answer or refer you to a report of an identical case? Depending on the nature of your business, it might even be appropriate to involve the police based on the story you tell.
the "right" thing to do is to suit them, but that is not our DNA, and would jeopardize the company we have now
I'm having trouble taking this seriously.
[+] [-] martinkallstrom|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dinkumthinkum|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] malandrew|15 years ago|reply
Seems like this guy is a surefire candidate to be included in such a list.
[+] [-] gasull|15 years ago|reply
It's a list of VCs to avoid.
I wish there was a place to submit "clients from hell" (I know a few), but I can see how this could be abused too.
[+] [-] wisty|15 years ago|reply
IANAL.
They have no right to ask for their investement back. They have offered to sell you all their shares for 400k within a week. You have made a counter offer, which they rejected.
You can give them a lower offer (370k, by the end of the year), but they can refuse.
Realistically, you might have to offer a bit more, as their investement has grown.
You can hit them with a suit if you want - they acted with apparent, but not actual authority. From wikipedia: "If the agent has acted without actual authority, but the principal is nevertheless bound because the agent had apparent authority, the agent is liable to indemnify the principal for any resulting loss or damage."
So you can ask them to pay you damages for anything they did without the right approval. You'll need a lawyer to do this.
You might want to ask them what charges they are thinking about making. There might be some minority investor rights they can sue over? But I'd ask a lawyer before doing this - I suspect this could force their hand, which you might not want to do.
Whatever the case, you want to buy them out, and make sure all the documentation for this is in good order.
[+] [-] wisty|15 years ago|reply
On the other hand, you can sue him for acting as an agent without actual authority. Those hires and purchases he made that you explicitly vetoed? Invoice him, and watch him squirm. Tell him he can pay for them with some of his shares. But ask a lawyer first.
If he keeps making noise, ask him if you can speak to his lawyer. He doesn't have one. No lawyer would advise him to make such stupid decisions (trying to roll a CEO with just 20% of shares, vague threats, etc).
You have to buy him out eventually, or he'll be a recurring headache. It might cost more than 400k, as his investement has matured.
[+] [-] Scott_MacGregor|15 years ago|reply
If you look in the Attorney engagement letter it probably has language about their duty is to represent the interests of the company only, and not the founders, shareholders, officers or other individuals or entities associated with the Company.
It seems like he wants to willingly pull out as employee and investor/board member, as long as he gets his investment back. So working out a solution for the payment for the shares (with the help of the company Attorney) might get the ball rolling on a solution for you guys.
Good luck with this.
[+] [-] stretchwithme|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|15 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] _b8r0|15 years ago|reply
It does look to me like you need to determine what your objectives are for the situation. From my point of view, if you can stomach it, kicking them out of the board is a top priority. I wouldn't worry too much about the shares as long as you can live with them being a silent (albeit voting) investor. If you're going to buy them out, make sure it's on your terms and doesn't put too much strain on the company.
[+] [-] redwoods|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] redwoods|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sp4rki|15 years ago|reply
In any case. Get A Laywer
[+] [-] dotBen|15 years ago|reply
As it happens, non-competes tend not to be enforceable in most states, although granted it doesn't say what jurisdiction (or even country) this is occurring in.
[+] [-] bretpiatt|15 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cletus|15 years ago|reply
The OP said he was terminating the guy with cause which is interesting. If the investment is contractually tied to the position it could of course be much more complicated.