Options for Enhancing Video of a Burglary?
62 points| jes | 6 years ago
The video shows his face, but it's not as clear as I would like. I don't know how to quantify its quality except to say its "not bad" but "not great either."
I would welcome any suggestions for extracting and improving still images from the two clips. I'd prefer to outsource this to someone that has experience in this kind of work.
I don't have a lot of confidence that the local police are going to invest a lot of time and effort in this, only because they are overloaded.
Any recommendations for providers or other actions to take would be appreciated.
[+] [-] brk|6 years ago|reply
If you want to contact me privately I can take a look at them and maybe offer some specific suggestions.
[+] [-] jes|6 years ago|reply
I would welcome any suggestions you might have. If you'll contact me at [email protected] I'll send you the two clips. I don't see how to find your email and I'm reluctant to ask you to disclose it publicly.
[+] [-] unknown|6 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] unknown|6 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] fortran77|6 years ago|reply
Here's a "practical" way to do it:
https://www.dpreview.com/articles/0727694641/here-s-how-to-p...
And here's an example of a research paper about it:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.04590.pdf
The local police will spend no time and effort on it. And any video you produce/enhance will not be able to be used as evidence by them.
[+] [-] ttul|6 years ago|reply
The problem is that I'm sure the subject moves considerably from one image to the next. You will have to isolate his face in each frame and transform the face grabs so that they line up perfectly before the images can be combined by averaging.
It's worth a shot!
[+] [-] jes|6 years ago|reply
I don't know much about this topic, but it seems reasonable to think that multiple frames ought to be useful in estimating subpixel values.
I agree with your take on the suggestion that that police won't spend time on it, and that any altered images wouldn't be admissible as evidence. They did spend considerable time taking fingerprints in my home. And even the original video is damning. I am hopeful that better quality images can be used to get the name and possible location of the suspect. I'm offering a reward of $1,000 to the first person that gives Kirkland PD information that leads to them interviewing a credible suspect.
I doubt that any of our property will be recovered. I'd like to see this individual off the streets. Perhaps someday, he will get treatment that would help him.
[+] [-] himinlomax|6 years ago|reply
It may not be good evidence in itself, but if the person is recognized, they could be investigated and more evidence found. It's not unlikely they'd be in possession stolen property, that their clothes match the video, that they left cell phone records in the vicinity and so on.
[+] [-] CharlesW|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jes|6 years ago|reply
Thank you for taking the time to help me with this.
[+] [-] behringer|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] samstave|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sansnomme|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tpmx|6 years ago|reply
a) using many frames to ID the perp
and perhaps
b) working at a native H.264 I/P frame level with the neural networks, rather than at a decoded framebuffer level.
[+] [-] nlh|6 years ago|reply
https://www.pixelmator.com/pro/machine-learning/
You could grab individual frames of the video and run them through this and see what the results look like?
(no connection to Pixelmator - just played with the software and it looked pretty darn cool)
[+] [-] drcode|6 years ago|reply
It is making up new image details (highly convincing and realistic new image details) and hence this tech is completely inappropriate for handling criminal evidence.
[+] [-] jes|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hackpert|6 years ago|reply
For example, check out https://www.astronomie.be/registax/
[+] [-] throwaway_tech|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pintxo|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] wizzerking|6 years ago|reply
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.08176.pdf
I'm sure github has some repos on this
[+] [-] piracy1|6 years ago|reply
For faces: https://www.geoffreylitt.com/2017/06/04/enhance-upscaling-im...
[+] [-] solveit|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jerome-jh|6 years ago|reply
Before investing real money on this, be aware of the legal value of these videos: do we really see the burglar forcing the front door? Taking your property? Is your neighbour entitled to film that area? The answer strongly depends on your local laws.
[+] [-] m3kw9|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cj|6 years ago|reply
Can this actually be done to any degree of usefulness?
[+] [-] s_kilk|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jaclaz|6 years ago|reply
If you want to test one, for "motion blur" (let's say the licence of a car driving away), get this (last freeware version):
https://github.com/Y-Vladimir/SmartDeblur/downloads
And test it on the images here (actual test images from a reknowned Commercial vendor of a suite that is also for videos):
https://articles.forensicfocus.com/2014/10/08/can-you-get-th...
[+] [-] jes|6 years ago|reply
https://www.dropbox.com/s/jkyxlkh0aa5d24m/IMG_5402.mp4?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/oxgwpe6bn39p0re/IMG_5404.mp4?dl=0
[+] [-] rs23296008n1|6 years ago|reply
Also, now you know your camera isn’t doing the best, add other camera(s) where it would have helped. Eg to capture face-on angle as you approach door. Consider upping the resolution of the cameras you add.
On a more general note, rethink about how this guy found your place as a suitable target. Mitigate what you can. He knew he had plenty of time. And he seemed quite comfortable being there.
[+] [-] throwaway_rock1|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lisk1|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ubercow13|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] andrewtbham|6 years ago|reply
https://www.fast.ai/
https://youtu.be/9spwoDYwW_I?t=2913
[+] [-] mackman|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] akeck|6 years ago|reply
https://github.com/alexjc/neural-enhance
[+] [-] c3534l|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] theincredulousk|6 years ago|reply
And your assertion that "any software technique...won't look like the face" is incorrect. Again using multiple frames, it's entirely possible to infer what clearer underlying detail would result in the less-sharp pixel values in the video, given the training data establishing the relationship. It's a specific technique for reconstruction, not just drawing in a realistic but synthetic replacement like Photoshop's content-aware fill.
[+] [-] jolmg|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] katyusha|6 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ravenstine|6 years ago|reply