Tell HN: 1k MRR is not 1k salary
22 points| artembugara | 5 years ago | reply
Let's talk about risk-reward.
I used to have a 6 digits job in tech. I've quit to start my own company. We're >1k MRR, my salary is $0/mo.
First, making money from your product/service is much more difficult than making money selling your time. So, I would agree that 1k MRR is an amazing achievement. Moreover, I hardly doubt that even 80% of top notch devs from SV can achieve 1k MRR working on a product from 0.
Second, I do realize that every day that I do not work for FAANG I lose money (by not being paid a salary). Still, I also understand that I have a chance to build 1B$ ARR company. I have a chance to start making much more than what I could working for someone. This chance is tiny but it exists.
Third, product's MRR and salary are different things. You might read this text having a $250k/mo salary while your company is doing bad. You're still paid your salary while your company is loosing millions every month. Does this mean you are a bad employe? Of course not.
Salary is not MRR.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25036526 [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25047838
[+] [-] seanwilson|5 years ago|reply
You could argue you're losing money being on Hacker News, sleeping more, cooking, talking to a friend, watching a movie etc.
Life isn't all about money. Some people are happier with the freedoms they get running their own business compared to e.g. making more money working 9 to 5 with less freedom on what they work on, how they work on it and when.
[+] [-] 2rsf|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] quickthrower2|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Jugurtha|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] scott31|5 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] krishnanvs|5 years ago|reply
Tech people tend to underestimate costs associated with running a business. Hosting, marketing, sales, salaries, rent. 1k MRR is a great milestone but yes it really is $0 in salary for founders.
[+] [-] psychstudio|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] shoo|5 years ago|reply
For an arbitrary example, here are some numbers of a tiny public company that's been operating for over 30 years: $75m annual revenue, about half of which is recurring software subscription revenue. The net profit for the shareholders of the company after tax is $8m, so about 10% of revenue. Of the 90% of expenses, the C-suite and board are collectively getting paid around $2.7m, so call it 4% of revenue.
[+] [-] textread|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ezekg|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] javajosh|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] draw_down|5 years ago|reply
Sure. And I’d hardly call myself top notch, so no doubt I’d be unable to achieve that.
Thing is I have no interest in doing that, partly because as it turns out I need quite a bit more than a thousand dollars in a month, and partly because I don’t like doing hard shit. Guess I’m just crazy like that. So it’s fortunate for me that I can make quite a bit more than that, with less risk and less effort, and a whole lot fewer sleepless nights.
[+] [-] quickthrower2|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bxk1|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] stevekemp|5 years ago|reply
(And that's obviously ignoring other costs, which might not be monthly. e.g. supplies, hardware, domain-name registration, etc.)
Of course the hope is that costs fall, and don't scale linearly with revenue. Allowing actual profit in the future.
[+] [-] bot41|5 years ago|reply