Ask HN: Why are e-ink note-taking devices so expensive compared to iPads?
I know there are some advantages to e-ink displays, but I don't think that's enough to justify the high price tag on these readers/note-taking devices.
There's also hidden costs involved, such as buying new tips for the e-ink pencils.
Has the e-ink industry reached a dead-end where patents are impeding progress, or are there other reasons involved?
[+] [-] throwaway4485we|5 years ago|reply
E-ink, the company, holds the patents of the pigment core tech that makes "paper-like" displays possible and strongarms the display manufacturers and the users of their displays to absolute silence. Any research project or startup that comes up with a better alternative technology gets bought out or buried by their lawyers ASAP.
E-ink don't make the display themselves, they make the e-ink film, filled with their patented pigment particles and sell it to display manufacturers who package the film in glass and a TFT layer and add a driver interface chip, all of which are proprietary AF and unless you're the size of Amazon, forget about getting any detailed datasheets about how to correctly drive their displays to get sharp images.
In my previous company we had to reverse engineer their waveforms in order to build usable products even though we were buying quite a lot of displays.
With so much control over the IP and the entire supply chain and due to the broken nature of the patent system, they're an absolute monopoly and have no incentive to lower prices or to bring any innovations to the market and are a textbook example of what happens to technology when there is zero competition.
So, when you see the high prices of e-paper gadgets, don't blame the manufacturers, as they're not price gouging, blame E-ink, as their displays make up the bulk of the BOM.
Tough, some of their tech is pretty dope. One day E-ink sent over a 32" 1440p prototype panel with 32 shades of B&W to show off. My God, was the picture gorgeous and sharp. I would have loved to have it as a PC monitor so I tried building an HDMI interface controller for it with an FPGA but failed due to a lack of time and documentation. Shame, although not a big loss as an estimated cost for that was near the five figure ballpark and the current consumption was astronomical, sometimes triggering the protection of the power supply on certain images.
[+] [-] pidg|5 years ago|reply
There is certainly enough to justify the cost, if you are a prolific note-taker.
Conversely, I find it hard to justify the cost of an iPad, becuase I already have a phone and several laptops. I can't see a situation where a tablet would be more useful to me, so I've never bought one.
Turns out different people have different needs, and the e-ink note-taking market caters to that. Most people would find an iPad more useful, so they're lower cost.
[+] [-] Larrikin|5 years ago|reply
The real game changer was when I started taking the iPad to the gym and putting it on the elliptical and could do required reading or rewatch classes.
There was a positive reinforcement loop of wanting to run a certain amount but then also wanting to stay on long enough to finish a chapter and then once again figuring I should run just a little longer and get ahead in class.
[+] [-] abeppu|5 years ago|reply
I have the first generation, and I do enjoy it. However, I think a distinction is _how_ one takes notes. For brainstorming, and just writing free-form, it's great. However, I find it really annoying for taking notes about a doc, for two reasons:
- If you need more notes than fit in the margins and whitespace of a PDF, are you going to flip between the doc and a separate file of notes? What if you want to compare two documents, and take notes about the distinct ways two authors discuss the same material? The idea that you can't have more than one thing open feels immediately limiting.
- If you're several pages into a doc and want to flip back to some prior point (and you don't recall the specific page number), it's actually pretty awkward.
I feel like these devices are on the cusp of being much more satisfying. But at present, either I print out all but one thing which I can deal with on the remarkable, or I end up looking at a combination of a laptop and the remarkable, and in either case, I can't help feeling that an obvious use case was not well considered.
[+] [-] _ph_|5 years ago|reply
Considering how small the company behind it is compared to Apple, I was positively surprised how well it is designed and made - in some aspects I consider it superior to the iPad. Apple can fund a lot or R&D thanks to the volume of iPad sales, a small company has much more problems to do so. And probably the reMarkable sales numbers are small compared to the iPad. At least they were able to bring down prices quite a bit with the second generation. To be honest, I wouldn't have paid much more than the 400€ for the device.
[+] [-] d3ckard|5 years ago|reply
Thanks for the recommendation for Remarkable 2, considering buying one for a while now.
[+] [-] visarga|5 years ago|reply
I like the pen and paper sensation, the fact that my handwriting is exactly the same as on paper, the ability to erase, rewrite, cut and paste.
I don't like the flaky sync but love seeing my drawings as PDFs. The LiveView function almost doesn't work but a third party app allows me to display the tablet on the desktop for Zoom meetings.
Arxiv PDFs are easy to read only if you crop or zoom, which is a bit unfortunate. I would have loved integration with Pocket, Dropbox, Arxiv and other sources. There's no TTS option, which is also unfortunate, because I find TTS doubles my focus when reading technical text.
[+] [-] mumblemumble|5 years ago|reply
I am thinking about getting one (or one of a couple other similar options), because I think it would be MUCH more comfortable for reading and annotating papers, which is my main practical use case for an iPad. And if it's at all a decent replacement for a paper notebook, that would reduce the number of things in my bag.
But I'm also a bit worried that the organizational features might be lacking. Specifically, it sounds like there's no fulltext search feature, and syncing has to be done through their cloud service, which sounds troublesome because I've already got a system and encompasses file types and tools that ReMarkable doesn't handle.
[+] [-] dominotw|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] crooked-v|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] zepto|5 years ago|reply
Would you mind saying what you find most useful?
I have an aging iPad and would very much like to replace it with an a-ink device because I don’t like staring at a light source.
[+] [-] pizza234|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rtkaratekid|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] extreme_orang|5 years ago|reply
Excellent for PDF annotation and taking notes. Quirky as it runs Android apps.
Excellent display for reading
[+] [-] spaetzleesser|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] toyg|5 years ago|reply
These days, whenever a new gadget comes up, my first reaction has become "I wonder how they try to screw you into a SaaS later".
[+] [-] habitue|5 years ago|reply
Edit: I think people may have the impression this is like Android where the process is "ok, first reboot, hold all the buttons but not that one button and then unlock root, then flash the rom with a custom version of the OS from this sketchy site and ... bam! You're in control now"
Actually it's like: sign into wifi on the device. It's now running an ssh server available on your network. The password to log in as root is in the settings. You can ssh in right then and write a bash script to do what you want.
[+] [-] charlesdaniels|5 years ago|reply
I was really considering getting one, but I think the bigger issue for me is the LiPo battery. You can’t take the thing apart without a heat gun because it’s held together with adhesive, so in a few years when the battery doesn’t hold a charge, you have an expensive paperweight. I would pay a premium for a thicker device that used normal screws so that consumables such as the battery can be replaced easily.
(Many devices these days are similar, so it’s not only ReMarkable doing this.)
[+] [-] chrismorgan|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dmitrygr|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] garrison|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dec0dedab0de|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] edent|5 years ago|reply
It has an 8inch screen - about the same size as the iPad mini. It runs Android 8 but, obviously, some apps work better than others. It came with several nibs for its pencil.
They have an 10 inch version for around £230. See https://goodereader.com/blog/electronic-readers/boyue-p10-is...
So, there are some cheapish, largeish, eInk devices out there.
I was told (and I have no way to back it up) that the yields on eInk are fairly low. They make a couple of square metres of screen, and then have to cut it to size. Because of defects in the process, they can have a lot of wastage. So the larger sizes are disproportionally more expensive.
[+] [-] Snitch-Thursday|5 years ago|reply
headphone jack
runs new enough android to run syncthing
supports SD card
[+] [-] brassattax|5 years ago|reply
First company to build something like this and bring the cost down to something a bit more reasonable will get my business.
[+] [-] dpritchett|5 years ago|reply
There are lots of us out here.
Some even people do their deep work on a separate airgapped computer just to preserve their focus.
[+] [-] nojito|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ericd|5 years ago|reply
It's like how not having junk food in the house makes dieting a lot easier - you don't have to use willpower to do the right thing, because the wrong thing is hard to do.
[+] [-] PurpleFoxy|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] corytheboyd|5 years ago|reply
Honestly I would rather have the iPad for note taking. Response times are important for rapid idea translation, and e-ink systems are very lacking here, whereas the iPad is not. Probably an unpopular opinion, but it’s my own experience.
[+] [-] pidg|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] PurpleFoxy|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ohitsdom|5 years ago|reply
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07QL11LWF
[+] [-] sneak|5 years ago|reply
Niche devices almost always cost more.
[+] [-] luplex|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] m-p-3|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] daniellarusso|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tyler109|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|5 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] tyler109|5 years ago|reply
There is lots of advice on affordable e-readers, diy e-readers and buying advice
[+] [-] aurizon|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] figers|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] RicoElectrico|5 years ago|reply
Sure e-ink has its flaws, but wouldn't it be better to have a smaller slice of a much larger cake?
OLED is patent encumbered too, there's also a patent holding company, despite that you can buy smallest modules for less than $2 on AliExpress.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22829798
[+] [-] anfractuosity|5 years ago|reply
They presumably wouldn't be covered by the e-ink patents, as they seem to work on a different principle.
[+] [-] StavrosK|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] arsome|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] inb4_cancelled|5 years ago|reply
I don't mind you using that word. It's a generic slur stripped of its original meaning. I use it all the time.
[+] [-] Naga|5 years ago|reply
https://www.verywellfamily.com/what-is-the-r-word-3105651
[+] [-] powerapple|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mlthoughts2018|5 years ago|reply
I’d also like better integrations with alternate cloud storage providers, but this is true for Apple products too.
Combine with the fact you can literally ssh to your Remarkable and write your own apps, it’s a no-brainer.