Ask HN: Are you also getting extremely obvious spam bypassing Gmail's filters?
575 points| kace91 | 4 years ago
sender: Динасий Колпаков <[email protected]> subject: Q7425 7235 F0 8741 (empty body)
They all have similar formats, with a .htm attached file with ridiculous names like "Elon secret invitation" or "how to get free bitcoin".
They are all look like 90's era spam. Yet not only aren't they caught in the spam filter, they arrive to my main inbox, they aren't even classified as promotions or anything.
I can also see a long CC list, since it's not hidden.
Are any of you also having a similar problem?
[+] [-] im_down_w_otp|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] uclastudent1000|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nikau|4 years ago|reply
Then for every email interaction with a 3rd party you make a unique address like [email protected].
You can then just add rules for each incoming mail domain to send them to a junk folder, especially if it was was a one time transaction and subsequent emails are just going to be marketing junk.
It also lets you know who has had their mailing lists compromised as there is virtually zero chance someone would guess the email address like the example above.
[+] [-] labria|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ksaj|4 years ago|reply
I drag them to the proper tab each time, but it doesn't seem to fix anything.
[+] [-] zz865|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] chj|4 years ago|reply
At the same time, all sorts of ads fall into my inbox repeatedly, even I deliberately mark them as spam or junk.
( Being cautious, I just checked the promotions again. And there is another important email lying. WTF!)
[+] [-] markogresak|4 years ago|reply
What I did to reduce the noise in my mailbox is to unsubscribe from all marketing emails, and I move the ones that still come through to spam folder. It was a bit tedious at first, but now gmail is doing a pretty good job at automatically filtering out senders that do not respect my request to unsubscribe.
[+] [-] samstave|4 years ago|reply
Am I missing something obvious?
[+] [-] kazinator|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] atregir|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] znpy|4 years ago|reply
I'm really surprised most people aren't realizing this.
[+] [-] filleokus|4 years ago|reply
I haven't heard anything about this when I asked colleagues / IRL friends... I wonder what is going on over at Google
[+] [-] kace91|4 years ago|reply
Except for the last one, all the calls to action seem to be crypto related, but I don't know if that's relevant to the origin of this attack. Perhaps it's just the most successful way of getting clicks nowadays (?).
It's baffling that google are letting these ones slip. Even marking some as spam does nothing to prevent new ones from coming.
[+] [-] kazinator|4 years ago|reply
Probably a whole lot of dont-give-a-darn-about-e-mail, because it's not new and sexy, and likely doesn't drive revenue.
Also, the people who suffer from gmail spam are often non-users of gmail. I.e. neither customers of Google, nor targets of its advertising, nor sources of personal information.
Google doesn't care if <[email protected]> is getting Gmail spam, because that's an outside entity whose existence does not benefit Google.
Plus, Google knows that Gmail is so huge, that nobody can just block all of Gmail. Unlike some small-time mail domain, they do not feel any risk that, if they don't take action to combat spam, they will be blocked as a whole.
If a small-time domain's machine gets listed in some DNS black-hole lists or other dynamic anti-spam databases, they have to care, or they don't get to send mail. It's a dire situation to which they have to respond.
If a Google machine gets listed in these databases, Google doesn't have to care. Anyone actually blocking Gmail machines is essentially just cutting themselves off from a huge e-mail communication hub. It's almost as if that operator were blacklisting itself.
Small fry: OK, that does it, I shall not receive Gmail!
Google: Hahaha; say bye bye to more than half your contacts, then!
In other words, Google knows that e-mail operators who are using blacklists have to pretty much whitelist Gmail servers, and so it doesn't care about blacklists.
[+] [-] samstave|4 years ago|reply
Interestingly, they can change the font of the subject lines which no valid email I have ever received in gmail has a subject with a different font.
That would be an interesting filter: if subject is !Font, then spam.
[+] [-] rigrassm|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jmcphers|4 years ago|reply
It's now happening regularly with emails from people in my contacts with whom I regularly exchange messages.
Mind-boggling. I know spam filtering is a hard problem, but these are just obvious misses.
[+] [-] moosedev|4 years ago|reply
20% of what is in my "Spam" folder today is what I'd call "spam" in the classical 90s/2000s-internet sense. Obvious trash/scam stuff, usually sex-related.
Most of the rest of my "Spam" looks like what Gmail usually just labels Promotions. It's mail from legitimate organizations that I did indeed give my email address to and have a reasonable expectation of getting semi-regular email from, even if it's just trying to sell me more stuff. The Promotions auto-labeling works (worked) just fine for managing that stuff.
I figured enough users are clicking the "Spam" button on enough "legit promotional" email from real organizations that they did agree to receive email from, that Gmail just started classifying it all as spam, and now doesn't/can't distinguish between "classic" spam and "annoying emails I can't be bothered to unsubscribe from". Sort of a tragedy of the commons of crowd-sourced spam filtering. But maybe there's a better explanation.
[+] [-] skinkestek|4 years ago|reply
I once caught my boss doing this (he was not a native English speaker, but absolutely used to communicating in English so it shocked me.)
[+] [-] pbhjpbhj|4 years ago|reply
Possibly the worst is not allowing replys. I mean if a customer sends me a message, and you block the reply as spam how is that serving that customer? Sure mark it, remove viruses, obfuscate links, but let me reply to someone!
[+] [-] superasn|4 years ago|reply
Clearly shows they give more weight to things like scanning, IP reputation, etc vs common sense.
[+] [-] rconti|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] thrower123|4 years ago|reply
Funny enough, the mails it penalizes worst are GMail addresses for small businesses, like my vet or the pizza shop.
[+] [-] lytefm|4 years ago|reply
For me privately, switching to a better provider solved that.
But having >25% GMail customers and always landing in Spam is horrible. Pretty much any other provider likes our mail server, but GMail always says spam.
Then you're going double opt-ins but customers still mark mails as spam because unsubscribing is too hard. Thanks for nothing.
There is actually an industry in gaming GMails spam filter to somehow get into the inbox: some offer automated replies and unmarking spam, some manually run hundreds of mailboxes and don't do anything else all day than unmarking mails as spam.
[+] [-] mattjaynes|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] thisjustinm|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] skellera|4 years ago|reply
I feel like it used to be near perfect. Something must’ve broken the models.
[+] [-] pmlnr|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lunatuna|4 years ago|reply
My personal account is pretty clean and rarely does anything get through that shouldn't. Occasionally I find something in the spam filter that shouldn't be there, usually password resets.
My work account is seeing a big increase in "professional" spam. "Hey Guy, did you see my last email I sent . . .", "Hey Guy, we are the top network security consultants . . ." Many of them are getting tagged Important. Some of them are so left field it doesn't make any sense that they are listed as important. Here's a good one:
"You asked for it, and we made it. We are delighted to present a complete redesign of our Merge Rules in Duplicate Check." - coming from mta.exacttarget.com
How is that not spam and how did it get tagged important? I have no idea who this company is. I've never done business or corresponded with them.
As I write this I'm coming to the realization that I'm a mechanical turk working for Google to find and report.
What's interesting is that many of the emails are coming from clear email marketing sources like HubSpot and Exact Target. Why would those get bumped up? I also notice some coming from something like xxxx.outbound.protection.outlook.com - not sure what that is exactly, but it mostly comes from companies directly marketing using their spf and dkim domain, but seems to passing through outlook.com.
Email is dying but will never be dead.
[+] [-] Ristovski|4 years ago|reply
I think Googles spam detection is a bit too much lax when the sender itself is using gmail.
These might as well be hacked accounts which have already proven themselves to be valid and "human" at a previous point in time? I doubt gmails spam detection would let a brand new account spam CC'd emails without any sort of detection.
[+] [-] gotrythis|4 years ago|reply
a) replies to emails I sent b) have anything to do with topics I'm actively involved with c) from senders who I have marked as not spam dozens of times
I never used to check the spam filter, now I do almost daily.
[+] [-] tclancy|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] stepanhruda|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] santiagobasulto|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] MrMember|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Saris|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] flowerlad|4 years ago|reply
Fun fact: Back in 2002 ycombinator founder Paul Graham wrote an article on spam filtering. (See http://www.paulgraham.com/spam.html ). I emailed him that his method can be defeated by sending an image of the text, as opposed to the text itself. PG replied and pointed me to this FAQ: http://www.paulgraham.com/spamfaq.html
In the FAQ there is an entry named "What if spammers sent their messages as images?" The answer indicates that is not going to be an issue, because there's still plenty of signals to go by.
Guess PG was wrong!
[+] [-] luis8|4 years ago|reply
onload="document.location.replace(window.atob('aHR0cHM6Ly9ibG9jay1jaGFpbi1ib3gudGsvbXpwaWwvP3RldHRoa3Yg'));"
Which if you decode you get a strange domain.
I assume gmail only looks for urls which in this case is not visible without decoding it
[+] [-] gruez|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] NavinF|4 years ago|reply
Maybe these emails are coming from real users that got hacked? That's probably the easiest way to get past the filter.
[+] [-] MrWiffles|4 years ago|reply
Also, I use a desktop email client (Spark on MacOS) with IMAP/SMTP. Massive improvement over any webmail client, especially GMail.
[+] [-] sp332|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hn_throwaway_99|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] awb|4 years ago|reply
I keep marking them as spam but more keep coming. About 1-2 per day and of varying content but similar visual layout. 90s era spam is a good description.
[+] [-] Twirrim|4 years ago|reply
This last month, maybe two, I've had extremely obvious spam hit my inbox repeatedly. Picking two cases from today, the subject is the same "FWD: FINAL CALL", from two different senders, "A P P L E" and "NET FLIX". The pattern is pretty much always the same, it's immediately obvious that it's spam. No idea why it's slipping past when they're still catching hundreds a day (I've had this hotmail account from the early days of the platform, used it a bunch all over the place)
[+] [-] alister|4 years ago|reply
What I did was to switch from Gmail to a paid email provider. Then I started giving every single business a unique email alias, though my friends all get the same email alias. Currently I have 370 active aliases. I've had to disable only 20 aliases in the whole decade which works out to only about 5% of my contacts.
As I said, I use no spam filtering whatsoever, so I find it amazing that Gmail users with spam filtering have such a different experience.
[+] [-] giarc|4 years ago|reply
https://imgur.com/4efNttg
[+] [-] retox|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] HighChaparral|4 years ago|reply